2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Yemeni men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
37
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results revealed significant differences in most of the soft tissue variables when comparing Saudis with Caucasian Americans as well as in other ethnic groups. Al-Gunaid et al [58] studied 50 adult Yemeni men (with a mean age was 23.1 years) with normal occlusion and esthetically pleasing profile and compared them with cephalometric standards of normal North American white people according to Legan-Burstone and Holdaway analyses. They concluded that soft-tissue facial profiles of white Yemenis and Americans are different in certain respects and these racial differences must be considered during diagnosis and treatment planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results revealed significant differences in most of the soft tissue variables when comparing Saudis with Caucasian Americans as well as in other ethnic groups. Al-Gunaid et al [58] studied 50 adult Yemeni men (with a mean age was 23.1 years) with normal occlusion and esthetically pleasing profile and compared them with cephalometric standards of normal North American white people according to Legan-Burstone and Holdaway analyses. They concluded that soft-tissue facial profiles of white Yemenis and Americans are different in certain respects and these racial differences must be considered during diagnosis and treatment planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length obtained from our study was similar to Caucasian, 25 Japenese, 26 and Kuwaitis 27 population (Table 3). [28][29][30][31][32] A limitation of Holdaway's nose prominence, as a soft tissue cephalometric parameter for assessing the nasal profile is that although it is relatively easy to measure, it does not provide a detailed cephalometric analysis of the nose. The other limitation of this value is that it is influenced by the soft tissue point labrale superioris, which is influenced immensely by the facio palatal inclination of the teeth; hence, we should consider other cephalometric values for measuring the length of the nose that are not to be influenced by the dentition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-Gunaid et al 16 (2007) estudaram comparativamente uma amostra de árabes com leucodermas norte-americanos.…”
Section: Revisão De Literatura E Discussãounclassified