Socio-Institutional Environment and Innovation in Russia

Smith, Natalya; Thomas, Katerina

doi:10.1080/10669868.2015.1021066

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 91 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Since global trends have determined the implementation of the transition to the introduction of innovative and digital technologies aimed at optimizing production processes, there have been significant shifts in the resource structure of the national economy. Unfortunately, the technological development of many countries is not sufficient to reorient the resource potential towards the intensive use of resources available for exploitation.To reduce scientific and technological backwardness, developing countries need to increase the intensification of intellectual processes in the economy, which implies identifying bottlenecks in the use of resource potential and promoting the creation of favorable institutional conditions for the (Ngo, 2016;Shang & Fagan, 2006Smith & Thomas, 2015 The resource potential diagnostic process takes into account not only the availability of resources, but also indicators of their increased use (or decrease in use). Depending on the complexity of the chosen diagnostic model, it is possible to lay down both reporting indicators and analyze information flows that characterize the factor formation of economic growth, the state of institutions, political stability, the standard of living of the population, innovative activity, intellectual development, etc.…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnostics of Regions Resource Potential in the Context of Socio-Economic Development

Zaytsev,

Dmitriev,

Kichigin

2023

J. Professional Business Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to study the possibilities for diagnosing the resource potential of the regions, taking into account the indicators of their socio-economic development. Theoretical framework: To conduct the study, the indicators characterizing the socio-economic development of the regions were analyzed; Based on the selected indicators, indices of sub-potentials and integral estimates of the resource potential of the regions were calculated. Design/methodology/approach: The diagnostics of the resource potential of the regions is carried out by means of an integral assessment of sub-potentials through an indicative analysis, where the average values for the country are the standard. The obtained indicative estimates (indices) for the sub-potentials of the resource potential make it possible to identify rent-forming conditions in the regions. It is proposed to use a “simplified” diagnostic model for the study, which contains the main indicators for analysis; in the "enlarged" model, it is planned to use an expanded range of indicators to identify dependencies, taking into account their dynamic changes. Approbation was carried out in the Russian region - Novgorod region. Findings: As a result of the study, indicative estimates (indices) of the subpotentials of the resource potential of the analyzed regions were obtained, and their integral estimates of the resource potential were determined. The diagnostics of the resource potential made it possible to rank the regions according to the factor conditions of socio-economic development, as well as to lay the basis for assessing the effectiveness of the use of regional resource opportunities. Research, Practical & Social implications: The study expands scientific knowledge in the field of formation and use of the resource potential of the regions. Improving the assessment system within the proposed approach for conducting diagnostics for specific regional tasks will allow for a competent regional policy with a focus on the strengths and weaknesses of the socio-economic development of the region. Originality/value: The value of the study lies in the ranking of regions depending on resource conditions, which can help determine rent-forming factors and build an assessment of the efficiency of using resource potential.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnostics of Regions Resource Potential in the Context of Socio-Economic Development

Zaytsev,

Dmitriev,

Kichigin

2023

J. Professional Business Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Here, the emphasis remains on understanding the roles of heterogeneous (de Zubielqui et al 2015 ) and diverse (van Wijk et al 2019 ) actors in mobilising the emotional energy and reflexive awareness necessary to disrupt the status quo, generate (and negotiate) alternatives, and embed solutions in institutional contexts to produce profound change. Diversity foci vary in several studies with interests including urban diversity (Smith and Thomas 2015 ), firm-university partnership diversity (Whitley 2014 ), and environmental technology diversity (Aragon-Correa and la Hiz 2016 ). These authors recognise variations in the idiosyncratic capabilities of firms for acquiring and allocating resources (Li 2015 ; Kang and He 2018 ) and how these capabilities influence the ability of institutions to generate environmental, social, and economic value for stakeholders (Yeung 2015 ).…”

Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ties, treaties, and collaborations (Richardson 1979 ; Fritsch and Schwirten 1999 ; Nooteboom 2000 ; Balthasar et al 2000 ; Watt 2002 ; Yingbo et al 2010 ; Rodima-Taylor et al 2012 ; Nieto and González-Álvarez 2014 ; Nam et al 2014 ; Smith and Thomas 2015 ; Lee and Law 2017 ; Vickers et al 2017 ; Schütz et al 2018 ; Hou et al 2019 ; Moon et al 2019 ; Kunamaneni 2019 ; Ting et al 2020 ; Ventura et al 2020 ; Chen et al 2021 )…”

Section: Management Priorities For Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This thematic group considers dynamics of organisational networks (Hage and Hollingsworth 2000 ; Schøtt and Jensen 2016 ), domesticated market networks (Van Bockhaven et al 2015 ), inter-organisational relations (Nooteboom 2000 ), innovation networks (Lyu et al 2019 ), connectedness of regional institutions (Liu 2016 ), networking practices (Minh and Hjortsø 2015 ), and cohesive networks (Kraft and Bausch 2018 ). Here, there are management interests in social capital (Nieto and González-Álvarez 2014 ; Smith and Thomas 2015 ), social and institutional trust (Audretsch et al 2018 ; Didenko et al 2020 ), and relationship ties that include managerial ties (Gao et al 2017 ; Ventura et al 2020 ) and social ties (Chen et al 2021 ).…”

Section: Management Priorities For Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

AlMalki

Durugbo

2022

Manag Rev Q

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Institutional innovation creates smart institutions that idiosyncratically thrive in a world of exponential change. Through policy-driven interventions and experiential learning, managers of institutions become adept at delivering praxis- and crisis-driven innovations required for survival and success. Similarly, the management of institutional innovation remains an interest in research due to links of this form of innovation to economic growth, and the demands of on-going major socioeconomic transformations due to technological advances, increased occurrences of major crises, and emerging socioeconomic challenges. Accordingly, a key question arising from the literature concerns the range of determinants and priorities that influence institutional innovation for delivering society value. Thus, the onus is on scholarship to capture and advance knowledge for harnessing the potency of institutional innovation. The purpose of this article is to analyse the current state of research on institutional innovation. Using the systematic review methodology, we identify and critically appraise 485 peer-reviewed scientific publications between 1969 and 2021. The review finds key determinants and management priorities with a view to developing a multi-level management model of institutional innovation. Guided by insights from the review, the article sets a research agenda for future management studies of institutional innovation.

show abstract

“…Portanto, o quadro institucional legalinstituições regulatóriastende a influenciar a inovação. Alguns estudos já direcionaram esforços em entender essa relação (Barros, 2015;Bigelow, 2014;Gao et al, 2016;Munene, 1995;Prokin et al, 2015;Smith & Thomas, 2015;Urban, 2016;Wu, 2013). Mesmo assim, a natureza dessa relação, entre o ambiente institucional e o desempenho de inovação da empresa, é uma questão não resolvida que precisa ser considerada pelos pesquisadores (Wu, 2013), tendo em vista que a natureza exata de como ela acontece permanece não entendida (Chittoor, Aulakh, & Ray, 2015).…”

Section: Discussão Dos Resultados Das Relações Do Ambiente Instituciounclassified

Ambiente institucional e inovação em startups: o papel moderador das incubadoras de empresas

Marques¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Socio-Institutional Environment and Innovation in Russia

Cited by 8 publications

References 91 publications

Diagnostics of Regions Resource Potential in the Context of Socio-Economic Development

Diagnostics of Regions Resource Potential in the Context of Socio-Economic Development

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

Ambiente institucional e inovação em startups: o papel moderador das incubadoras de empresas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About