2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic factors affecting the conservation of natural woodlands in Central Riyadh Area – Saudi Arabia

Abstract: This study aimed to identify some socioeconomic factors affecting local people in central Riyadh area for the utilization of wood and other energy sources in cooking and heating in order to develop some recommendations for conserving woodlands. The study results revealed that gas is the most common energy source used for cooking with a mean usage level of 2.79 (SD = 0.58). On the other hand, wood ranked first for heating with the highest mean, usage level of 1.90 (SD = 1.06). However, electricity and gas as so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a statistically significant relationship between education levels and attitude to pricing (p < 0.05). Education level is an important indicator of awareness and protection of natural resources positively [9,35,38], but unexpected results have been obtained in this research between the subgroups and the reference group. The literate farmers have an attitude of 39.7% of less likely to support pricing negatively as compared to the reference group that is made up of the farmers who are university graduates.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…There is a statistically significant relationship between education levels and attitude to pricing (p < 0.05). Education level is an important indicator of awareness and protection of natural resources positively [9,35,38], but unexpected results have been obtained in this research between the subgroups and the reference group. The literate farmers have an attitude of 39.7% of less likely to support pricing negatively as compared to the reference group that is made up of the farmers who are university graduates.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The participants in the interview and group discussions argued that forest degradation can be reduced through the introduction of forest and proper land management enforcement rules and regulations, price subsidizing for alternative sources of energy (solar), and institutionalize educational programs that enhance awareness levels of local people to manage and conserve forestland sustainably. Consistent with the present results on forest strategies perceived by the farmers in the two study regions, several previous reports have con rmed the need for natural regeneration and enrichment planting and soil and water conservation structures and their integration (Aerts et al 2009;Hosonuma et al 2012;Al-Subaiee 2016), strengthen forest governance and law enforcement, promote sustainable rewood collection (e.g. through awareness-raising, local regulations and law enforcement), and rewood e ciency (e.g., use of e cient stoves and heaters) (Hosonuma et al 2012;Al-Subaiee 2016).…”
Section: Farmers Perception On Indicators Of Forest Degradationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Farmland size: A farmer having larger land size could associate with forest land as such land is found from a forest area and so this increases perception on forest degradation. Farmland size is thus hypothesized to in uence positively farmers' perception on forest degradation (Bogale 2011;Al-Subaiee 2016). It is a continuous variable.…”
Section: Description Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They disagree with grazing prohibition. These findings are not in line with Tortop (2012) and Alsubaiee (2016) who found that education has a great impact on creating awareness regarding the importance of forest conservation. Based our finding, effect of educational level on perception on grazing prohibition is unsignificant.…”
Section: Educationcontrasting
confidence: 68%