Socially mediated authenticity

Abstract

PurposeUse of digital media channels is growing in public communication. Given the importance of public trust in government figures and agencies, combined with the risk and fear of misrepresentation inherent in online interaction, it is important to develop theoretical frameworks for investigating the ways in which authenticity is constructed in online public affairs communication. The purpose of this paper is to produce a preliminary model of authenticity in online communication, with particular emphasis on public institutions.Design/methodology/approachThe paper first develops a theoretical model of authenticity from existing literature in various disciplines. It then uses that model to explore a quantitative and qualitative content analysis of the comments on the US State Department blog, DipNote, from its inception to the end of the Bush Administration.FindingsDespite limited interactions between DipNote authors and commenters, the types and quantity of responses to posts indicate a desire by some readers to discuss the topics raised in the blog space. These responses also suggest that at least some commenters find that the blog meets their criteria for authenticity to the extent necessary to engage in community‐type interaction within its virtual boundaries. A functional‐structural analysis of the blog responses supports the essential components of the theoretical model proposed, which suggests that DipNote presents a mixed form of authenticity.Originality/valueAuthenticity is particularly important in the public sphere, and public institutions are increasingly engaging with social media as a means of connecting with constituencies. This paper proposes a starting‐point for theory development regarding this significant emerging area of communication.

The transparent communicative organization and new hybrid forms of content

“…While there is no universal definition of transparency (Sisco & McCorkindale, 2013), scholars agree that it is related to openness, truthfulness, public information needs (Baker, 2008;Rawlins, 2009), credibility (Miller & Sinclair, 2009;Plaisance, 2007;Sisco & McCorkindale, 2013) and trust (Miller & Sinclair, 2009;Plaisance, 2007;Rawlins, 2009). Some disagreement is also apparent as to whether transparency is an umbrella concept or merely a vital part of another concept such as authenticity or ethics (Gilpin, Palazzolo, & Brody, 2010).…”

“…It is related to organizations' actions of offering their information for public scrutiny (Gilpin et al, 2010) as well as to organizational responsibility to provide the necessary information to make informed decisions (Rawlins, 2009). Thus, accountability relates to organizational responsibility for actions, initiated by social norms or regulations (Miller & Sinclair, 2009).…”

Media Convergence and Convergence Strategies in Human Resource Management

“…As well as this emotional positioning, companies enrich their communication with elements that are able to transport emotions such as online videos (e.g. Freer 2011) or "authentic" weblog postings (Gilpin et al 2010).…”

Panacea, placebo or prudence: Perspectives and constraints for corporate dialogue

“…It has been stated that social media can aid aspects that may improve a corporation's dialogic orientation such as authenticity, transparency, and openness (Gilpin, Henderson, Palazzolo, & Brody, 2010). However, this "lifting of the corporate veil brings both complexity and uncertainty" to practicing public relations (Duhé, 2007, p. 58).…”