Social Psychology: Research Methods

Figgou, Lia; Pavlopoulos, Vassilis

doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.24028-2

Cited by 49 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We adopted a narrative analysis approach in this study to better understand the entertainment content in 13 Reasons Why Season 1. Narrative analysis is an analytic approach in social and behavioral sciences with a focus on the interpretation of information conveyed in the form of stories, and it has been used in social psychology, communication research, and media studies [ 65 , 66 ]. Scholars have examined a wide range of elements from character development and overarching themes to narrative structure and dramatic performance, but these choices are usually made according to the study aims and research inquiries [ 65 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Popular media as a double-edged sword: An entertainment narrative analysis of the controversial Netflix series 13 Reasons Why

Wang

Parris

2021

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

13 Reasons Why is a Netflix original series adapted from Jay Asher’s 2007 young adult novel with the same title. Season 1 premiered on March 31, 2017 and featured the sensitive issue of teen suicide along with bullying, substance use, depression, and sexual assault. Unlike the typical teen dramas on popular streaming platforms, this show was created not only for entertainment, but also to stimulate conversations about taboo topics that people often shy away from. However, it also caused significant controversy, especially criticism around the main character Hannah’s suicide scene. More than three years into the initial controversy and at least two dozen scholarly publications later, this study is the first to examine the entertainment narrative content of 13 Reasons Why Season 1 to better understand how these health and social issues were portrayed in the show, what specific examples we could identify as potential behavioral modeling, and to what degree it complied with the 2017 WHO guidelines for media professionals. We used the framing theory and social cognitive theory in communication research and media studies as our guiding conceptual frameworks and a narrative analysis approach to investigate a total of 660 cut scenes in all 13 episodes. Our findings provided empirical evidence, along with contextual information and detailed examples, to demonstrate that a popular entertainment program like the Netflix series 13 Reasons Why serves as a double-edged sword. The production team’s good will and due diligence are commendable. Yet, additional steps can be taken in the future to effectively promote professional resources and reduce viewers’ risks, especially the most vulnerable groups.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Popular media as a double-edged sword: An entertainment narrative analysis of the controversial Netflix series 13 Reasons Why

Wang

Parris

2021

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Each Manager was evaluated by an average of 12-15 people. In psychological literature, this number of respondents is estimated as the most optimal for adequate reproduction of the personality image and for obtaining results with a low level of error [10]. When processing the Bank of received ratings, the average and range of confidence intervals for each quality were calculated for all managers.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of perceptual attitudes of managers in the cognition of employees of the organization

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses the features of perceptual attitudes in the process of cognition of employees of the organization. Evaluation is understood as a manifestation of the evaluative component of thinking about another, and the perceptual attitude as a person's predisposition to perceive, act and evaluate the subject of interpersonal interaction in a certain way. The features of understanding evaluations in modern psychology are revealed, and the role of the evaluation component in thinking about another person is shown. The article presents socio-demographic professional factors that influence the formation of both employee and employee evaluations by the Manager. The main results of the study are described, indicating that the nature of self-esteem (overestimated or underestimated self-esteem) and the perceptual attitudes of the Manager determine the General trend of employee reflection. The identified trends and features of interpersonal cognition, the preservation of which is provided by setting mechanisms, reflect the attitude to individual qualities that managers have formed in the process of joint activities in terms of their significance for the implementation of the goals of the activity. However, changes in the goals of activities also lead to changes in the direction and nature of assessments from the outside.

show abstract

“…The following was found when analyzing the number of papers produced and the number of authors: 113 authors of 43 papers, of which 88% (99) are authors of a single work and 12% (14) of more than one work. Five was the maximum number of papers written by the same author.…”

Section: Via a Bibliometric Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The author or authors, now as narrator or narrators, should reveal characters, scenarios, and narrative content, and even include the field of knowledge itself or a singular figure as a "character". In the language of Foucault 14 [ The analyses will be made from the grouping of keywords with one or more examples. The texts have different approaches to the narrative theory, depending on "where" the authors are talking, technically, what the "narrative focus" is, which turns them into narrators.…”

Section: What Narratives Saymentioning

confidence: 99%

O campo narrativo na Revista Ciência & Saúde Coletiva

Nunes

2020

Ciênc. saúde coletiva

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo O artigo aborda o campo narrativo na Revista “Ciência & Saúde Coletiva”. A noção de “campo narrativo” é construída nas relações das dimensões cognitiva (epistêmica), sócio-politica-pedagógica e aplicada. Trata-se de pesquisa exploratória quantitativo-qualitativa abordando autores, temas, questões teórico-metodológicas, conceitos e disciplinas. A pesquisa na base SciELO tem dois momentos: 1. Contexto - Restrito às publicações na saúde, pesquisa em 29/01/2019, descritor “narrativa + saúde” (sem filtro); 2. Pesquisa bibliométrica - dados coletados em dezembro de 2019, descritor “narrativa + ciência e saúde coletiva”, período 2002-2019; nenhuma referência foi encontrada na revista antes de 2002. Na análise dos 43 textos, os artigos foram agrupados em: análise narrativa, revisões narrativas, textos narrativos, biografia e tradução. Conclui-se pela relevância do tema, apesar de o número de artigos ser pequeno. Sugestões para trabalhos futuros: enfatizar as abordagens teóricas do trabalho narrativo e demarcar suas perspectivas, como uma abordagem ou um objeto, ou como ambos.

show abstract

Social Psychology: Research Methods

Cited by 49 publications

References 18 publications

Popular media as a double-edged sword: An entertainment narrative analysis of the controversial Netflix series 13 Reasons Why

Popular media as a double-edged sword: An entertainment narrative analysis of the controversial Netflix series 13 Reasons Why

The role of perceptual attitudes of managers in the cognition of employees of the organization

O campo narrativo na Revista Ciência & Saúde Coletiva

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About