Social Networking in Library and Information Services:Current Scenario

Abstract

Social Networking (SN) began from late 20th Century and is growing up rapidly. It works as a medium of communication with one to another for sharing their experiences and information regarding their interest, and also helps to build up longtime relationship between individuals and groups. In the field of LIS services, it may help to promote the services of LIC (Library and Information Centers). This study provides the efficient account of SN tools and how it affects communication with others. The findings disclose that some SN tools are gaining popularity among LIS professionals as they use at least one of Social Networking Sites (SNS). The most active professionals are from younger generation between the age group of 26-35 years. The professionals opine that SNS is very effective to deliver the services of LIC.

Types of Social-Media and Academic Performance of Students in Primary School Teachers' Training Colleges in Vihiga County, Kenya

“…This agreed with Manasijević, }ivković, Arsić and Miloaević (2016) who argued that learners utilize Facebook in their learning process to communicate and interact with others. Similarly, the study by Aslam and Nazim (2016) revealed that most people daily use Facebook followed by Twitter, Google+, MySpace, Fliker and Bebo to communicate with other people. Archana and Jyotsna (2015) observed that learners in India are heavy users of social media like Facebook, Twitter, Google+, WhatsApp, Myspace and gaming sites.…”

“…(2017) argued Facebook was the most popular social media among distance education students in Turkey followed by YouTube and Instagram. Aslam and Nazim (2016) study noted that most library information professionals in India access Facebook, Twitter, Bebo, Google+, Fliker and MySpace daily to talk with other people. Also, Hameed, Maqbool, Aslam, Hassan and Anwar (2013) noted that social media is used often by university learners in Pakistan to share with their colleagues.…”

Rural accessibility to digital libraries: requirements and challenges

“…Furthermore, it can enable human rights, empower communities, and facilitate sustainable development (Ayeni, 2019). Nazim (2009) points out that the digital library contains a digital representation of the objects found in it and is accessible through the internet, even though it is not accessible to everyone. Briggs (2021) notifies that by the year 2019 only 1.2% of the rural population had access to internet at home, with metropolitan areas at 15.4% and the urban areas at 7.2%.…”

Unveiling the Status of Open Access Dairy Research in India through Data Carpentry

“…Researchers such as Arunachalam (1998), Arunachalam and Umarani (2001), and Sagar et al (2014) have explored agriculture research in India, while Raychoudhury and Sarkhel (2011) have examined agriculture research in West Bengal using bibliometric and scientometric approaches. Additionally, several researchers (Lal et al, 1996;Sangam et al, 2014;Suryanarayana, 2002;Tripathi et al, 2013) have attempted to assess the publication status of various disciplines within the agriculture domain. Several authors (Abraham et al, 2009;Guttikonda et al, 2009;Kumar et al, 2012;Shukla and Singh, 2009)…”