The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.7896/j.1908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media for interactions with customers within the short food supply chain: the case of the SKIN project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of digital technology and social media platforms in SFSCs has recently been documented as a vector for scaling-up, notably in the ongoing H2020 SKIN and SMARTCHAIN projects. For instance, a recent study from the SKIN project evaluated the role of social media in SFSCs, particularly Facebook, but found producers use it more as a sales and marketing tool than as a platform for consumer interaction [61]. On the other hand, actors of online SFSC sales open-source platforms, like the international Open Food Network, emphasize the virtual dimension of SFSCs as enabling the democratisation and reappropriation of food, collective mobilisation and the building of resilient local food economies [62].…”
Section: Moving Past Definitions Three Directions For Further Research On Sfsc Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of digital technology and social media platforms in SFSCs has recently been documented as a vector for scaling-up, notably in the ongoing H2020 SKIN and SMARTCHAIN projects. For instance, a recent study from the SKIN project evaluated the role of social media in SFSCs, particularly Facebook, but found producers use it more as a sales and marketing tool than as a platform for consumer interaction [61]. On the other hand, actors of online SFSC sales open-source platforms, like the international Open Food Network, emphasize the virtual dimension of SFSCs as enabling the democratisation and reappropriation of food, collective mobilisation and the building of resilient local food economies [62].…”
Section: Moving Past Definitions Three Directions For Further Research On Sfsc Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased workload can also affect the continuity of the farm operation, i.e., the desire of the following generation to take over the family business [25,81]. Work organisation in SFSCs remains an important issue, also from an environmental perspective (see Section 4.3), while the use of digital technologies opens new, time-saving opportunities, yet requires skills [61].…”
Section: The Economic Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instant messaging affords more accessibility and intimacy among consumers, is more immersive and cost-reducing, and exerts greater social influence (Cao et al, 2020). For a comparison, Drejerska and colleagues find that the social media platform Facebook is primarily used by producers to share information, but the interactions (i. e. comments and sharing) between farmers and consumers are limited (Drejerska et al, 2019). Our research focus is on social commerce SFSC that uses WhatsApp, a private chat group.…”
Section: Sampling and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social commerce increases community-level participation and socioeconomic activity (Liang and Turban, 2011) and, at the same time, it merges the online and offline environments (Wang and Zhang, 2012). Producers have a higher probability of connecting directly with consumers through social media and obtaining feedback from them (Drejerska et al, 2019;Elghannam et al, 2018). Social commerce as a medium for frequent communication and interaction between members can increase trust through mutual understanding (Ji et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for social sustainability, the relationship between producers and consumers (often direct) has reinforced the fairness and trustbased relations among the actors who are involved in these food chains (Ilbery and Maye 2005; Aubry and Kebir 2013). Moreover, as referred by Drejerska et al (2019), using social media farmers and other promotors of SFSCs can also communicate their social responsibility.…”
Section: Meanings and Benefits Of Sfscsmentioning
confidence: 99%