Corporate Social Capital and Liability 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5027-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Capital of Organization: Conceptualization, Level of Analysis, and Performance Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Managerial ties-the boundary-spanning ties and interpersonal connections of top managers-have vital influences on a corporation's activities (Burt, 1992;Uzzi, 1996) and may be a source of competitive advantage (Mizruchi, 1996;Tsang, 1998) and superior performance (Batjargal, 2003;Park & Luo, 2001). Top managers devote their efforts to developing and maintaining relationships with partners in order to acquire external resources which will enable them to be continually innovative and to produce products and services at competitive prices and high quality (Burt, 1992;Kraatz, 1998;Pennings & Lee, 1999;Pennings, Lee, & van Witteloostuijn, 1998;Uzzi, 1996). Peng and Luo (2000) and Li (2005) identify two types of managerial ties: (1) ties with business partners, which are connections with top managers at other corporations, such as buyers, suppliers, and competitors, and (2) ties with the government, which are connections with government officials (Luo & Chen, 1997;Peng & Luo, 2000).…”
Section: Managerial Tiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Managerial ties-the boundary-spanning ties and interpersonal connections of top managers-have vital influences on a corporation's activities (Burt, 1992;Uzzi, 1996) and may be a source of competitive advantage (Mizruchi, 1996;Tsang, 1998) and superior performance (Batjargal, 2003;Park & Luo, 2001). Top managers devote their efforts to developing and maintaining relationships with partners in order to acquire external resources which will enable them to be continually innovative and to produce products and services at competitive prices and high quality (Burt, 1992;Kraatz, 1998;Pennings & Lee, 1999;Pennings, Lee, & van Witteloostuijn, 1998;Uzzi, 1996). Peng and Luo (2000) and Li (2005) identify two types of managerial ties: (1) ties with business partners, which are connections with top managers at other corporations, such as buyers, suppliers, and competitors, and (2) ties with the government, which are connections with government officials (Luo & Chen, 1997;Peng & Luo, 2000).…”
Section: Managerial Tiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ao definir o campo estratégico como escopo, os autores utilizam as premissas da Visão Baseada em Recursos (VBR), associando-as ao conceito de capital social. Dessa forma, percebe-se que o CSO tem sido rotineiramente abordado pela literatura à luz da VBR, no intuito de explicar as vantagens do CSO (ARREGLE et al, 2007;EDELMAN et al, 2004;LEANA;VAN BUREN, 1999;PENNINGS;LEE, 1998).…”
Section: Capital Social Organizacional No Terceiro Setorunclassified
“…O CSO tem sido rotineiramente abordado pela literatura à luz da VBR, por isso é possível identificar autores que apresentam as características da VBR para explicar as vantagens do CSO (AR-REGLE et al, 2007;EDELMAN et al, 2004; LEANA; VAN BUREN, 1999;PENNINGS;LEE, 1998). O CSO consiste na boa vontade e nos recursos que as organizações acessam por meio de suas relações com outras organizações (ZAHRA, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Adler and Kwon (2002) posited that social capital is not only a unique resource, unable to be traded on an open market, but that it is not easily exchanged from one organization to another. Other scholars have also stated that the specific features of social capital make it a potential source of organizational competitive advantage, leading an organization to success in a competitive sector (Hau, Kim, Lee, & Kim, 2013;Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998;Pennings & Lee, 1999). While Putnam (2000) stressed that networks, norms, trust and cooperation were the key elements of social capital, Coleman (1988) lists trust, responsibilities, expectations, norms, relationships and cooperation.…”
Section: Social Capital Of Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%