2012
DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.5.1857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Capital and Social Quilts: Network Patterns of Favor Exchange

Abstract: We examine the informal exchange of favors in societies such that any two individuals interact too infrequently to sustain exchange, but such that the social pressure of the possible loss of multiple relationships can sustain exchange. Patterns of exchange that are locally enforceable and renegotiation-proof necessitate that all links are "supported": any two individuals exchanging favors have a common friend. In symmetric settings, such robust networks are "social quilts": tree-like unions of completely conne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
239
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
239
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some scholars have argued that either adding connections to a network or changing the structure of the existing connections can promote successful coordination (Gould, 1993;Cassar, 2007;Watts and Strogatz, 1998) but changing the structure of connections can create new dependencies and therefore more obstacles to collective performance (Chwe, 2000;Enemark et al, 2011;Siegel, 2009;Lazer and Friedman, 2007;Jackson et al, 2012). Watts (2003) considered identifying the likely effects of adding connections or changing network structure a particularly vexing problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars have argued that either adding connections to a network or changing the structure of the existing connections can promote successful coordination (Gould, 1993;Cassar, 2007;Watts and Strogatz, 1998) but changing the structure of connections can create new dependencies and therefore more obstacles to collective performance (Chwe, 2000;Enemark et al, 2011;Siegel, 2009;Lazer and Friedman, 2007;Jackson et al, 2012). Watts (2003) considered identifying the likely effects of adding connections or changing network structure a particularly vexing problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 3 (right), this measure asks, for a pair of neighbors i and j, whether there exists at least one node k that is connected to both i and j. This measure of having a "friend in common" or "shared neighbor" is also termed "support" by Jackson, Rodriguez-Barraquer and Tan (2012), who study its role in providing incentives for individuals i and j to act cooperatively in a relationship, with the interpretation that a common neighbor can help support the provision of incentives in a relationship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make the point starkly, as illustrated in Figure 11 Clustering can appear in cases of extreme homophily, even with independence -simply because links form among groups of individuals who all have the same characteristics (e.g., see Graham (2014)). However, correlation persists in many settings, even after conditioning on nodal characteristics (e.g., see Jackson, Rodriguez-Barraquer and Tan (2012)). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Newbert and Tornikoski, 2012). Close interaction within groups with the same objectives leads to the development of cooperatives societies (Matthew et al, 2012). Empowerment of women is very important in developing countries because their participation is very important to the socio-economic development of the country (Noreen, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%