Social capital and national innovation system: a cross-country analysis

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -In the last two decades, researchers have paid much attention to the role of cultural values on economic and social development. In particular, the crucial role of different aspects of culture on the development of innovation has been stressed in the literature. Consequently, it is vital to understand how social capital, as a core cultural value, affects the innovation process and the innovative performance at the national level. However, to date, the impact of different dimensions of social capital and innovation has not been properly portrayed or explained. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of four different dimensions of social capital (institutional and interpersonal, associational life and norms) on two of the main functions of national innovation system (NIS) (entrepreneurship and knowledge creation) based on over 50,000 observations in 34 countries. Design/methodology/approach -In this regard, national-level data from the World Values Survey database was employed to quantify social capital. Entrepreneurship is, in turn, assumed to consist of three sub-indexes and 14 indicators based on the Global Entrepreneurship Index. Knowledge creation is also measured through US Patent Office applications. Also, exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling approach were used to build the measurement model and investigate the impact that each factor of social capital had on entrepreneurship and knowledge application, respectively. Measurement and structural models were built and their reliability and validity were tested using various fit indices. Research findings suggest the strong positive effect of institutional trust and networking on entrepreneurship. Also, interpersonal trust and networks were shown to have high influence on knowledge development at the national level. Norms appear to have naïve to medium negative effects on both functions. Findings -Research findings suggest the strong positive effect of institutional trust and networking on entrepreneurship. Also, interpersonal trust and networks were shown to have high influence on knowledge development at the national level. Norms appear to have naïve to medium negative...

Impact of information technologies and social networks on knowledge management processes in Middle Eastern audit and consulting companies

“…The relatively high correlation with knowledge application, in turn, demonstrates the importance of social exchange in cognitive processes of transforming and using the acquired knowledge (Ghazinoory et al, 2014).…”

Not Only Individualism: The Effects of Long-Term Orientation and Other Cultural Variables on National Innovation Success

“…Furthermore, since the initial research in this field, there has been an improvement in measurement of both innovation activity at the national level and cultural variables. The tradition of concentrating almost solely on R&D intensity has been changing toward encompassing non-R&D and incremental forms of innovation, also pointing out their adequacy for global analysis (Burns, Machado, & Corte, 2015a, 2015b, 2016; Ghazinoory, Bitaab, & Lohsrabi, 2014; Howaldt & Schwarz, 2010; Mulgan, Tucker, Rushanara, & Sanders, 2007; Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] & Statistical Office of the European Communities [SOEC], 2005; Westwood & Low, 2003). Furthermore, the recent major study (Minkov, 2017; Minkov, Bond et al, 2017; Minkov, Dutt et al, 2017) suggesting fundamental revisions to Hofstede’s measures (that were employed in all prior studies of the effects of culture of national innovation intensity) signals the need to update the empirical evidence for the culture-innovation relationship.…”

Ülkelerin İnovasyon Düzeyinin Sosyal Sermaye, Ekonomik Değer Algısı ve Politik Kültürle Karmaşık İlişkisi: Bulanık Küme Nitel Karşılaştırmalı Analiz

“…In this sense, while correlational or descriptive studies between social capital and innovation (Brockman et. al., 2018;Cáceres-Carrasco et al, 2020;Cho, 2018;Dakhli & De Clercq, 2004;Doh & Ács, 2009;Ghazinoory et al, 2014;Knack & Keefer, 1997;Putnam, 1993), correlational or descriptive studies between economic value perception and…”