1991
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(91)90297-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social behavior, dominance, and social deprivation of rats determine drug choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

11
116
3
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
11
116
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lesscher et al (2010) used a limited access choice paradigm in mice. Resonating well with the findings of Wolfgramm (1991) and Wolffgramm and Heyne (1991), these mice readily escalated their alcohol intake and also became insensitive to quinine. Remarkably, this was apparent when the devalued solution was the only source of alcohol for the mice (i.e., the choice was between alcohol+quinine and water) after only 2 weeks of alcohol experience.…”
Section: Resistance To Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lesscher et al (2010) used a limited access choice paradigm in mice. Resonating well with the findings of Wolfgramm (1991) and Wolffgramm and Heyne (1991), these mice readily escalated their alcohol intake and also became insensitive to quinine. Remarkably, this was apparent when the devalued solution was the only source of alcohol for the mice (i.e., the choice was between alcohol+quinine and water) after only 2 weeks of alcohol experience.…”
Section: Resistance To Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In their pioneering studies on the development of alcohol addiction in rats, Wolffgramm (1991) and Wolffgramm and Heyne (1991), not only demonstrated escalation of intake, they also observed resistance to punishment in the form of insensitivity to quinine. That is, the rats that showed elevated levels of alcohol intake also displayed a smaller reduction of alcohol intake when the solution was made bitter with quinine.…”
Section: Resistance To Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the majority of preclinical research investigating the impact of social and environmental enrichment on ethanol and sucrose consumption has been directed toward ethanol consumption (see Tables 1 and 2). While there is considerable methodological variation between the models used in these studies (species, strain, ethanol concentration, type and length of ethanol access), they generally show that social deprivation (individual rather than group housing) increases ethanol consumption (Lodge & Lawrence, 2003;Schenk, Gorman, & Amit, 1990;Wolffgramm, 1990;Wolffgramm & Heyne, 1991). The role of other types of environmental enrichment designed to provide physical and/or cognitive stimulation is less clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulating effects of direct proximal social interactions on ethanol intake have also been reported in a number of rodent species, including rats [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], mice [14,15,16], and prairie voles [17,18]. It should be noted that several early investigations employing animal subjects evaluated the effects of social stimulation by comparing ethanol consumption in isolation-housed versus group-housed rodents, and found little evidence of social stimulation of ethanol drinking [7,8,16,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that several early investigations employing animal subjects evaluated the effects of social stimulation by comparing ethanol consumption in isolation-housed versus group-housed rodents, and found little evidence of social stimulation of ethanol drinking [7,8,16,19,20]. In their group-housing arrangements, more than one subject was placed in a cage, allowing for direct physical contact among members of the group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%