2016
DOI: 10.4303/jdar/235949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Proximal and Distal Social Stimulation on Ethanol Intake in Male and Female CD-1 Mice

Abstract: Background. Proximal and distal social stimulation increase ethanol drinking in humans. Purpose. Our study evaluated the effects of proximal and distal social stimulation on home-cage ethanol drinking in mice. Study design. Proximal cagemate drinking (PCD) procedures use a clear plastic barrier to separate the drinker mouse from the proximal cagemate mouse, to evaluate home-cage drinking of 10% ethanol and water. Eight groups of CD-1 mice were arranged in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design with two levels of sex of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether, these results suggest the presence of a peer may either predispose drug use through imitation or distract from drug use depending at which stage of drug use the presence of a peer occurs and how receptive the user is to peers. Such complex interactions could explain the different directions that have been observed depending on the matching of drug experience, the sex and the social housing conditions (Tomie et al, 2014;Tomie et al, 2016). Characterizing the factors that influences these opposing processes are important to understand the effects of peer on drug use.…”
Section: Presence Of a Peer Also Consumingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether, these results suggest the presence of a peer may either predispose drug use through imitation or distract from drug use depending at which stage of drug use the presence of a peer occurs and how receptive the user is to peers. Such complex interactions could explain the different directions that have been observed depending on the matching of drug experience, the sex and the social housing conditions (Tomie et al, 2014;Tomie et al, 2016). Characterizing the factors that influences these opposing processes are important to understand the effects of peer on drug use.…”
Section: Presence Of a Peer Also Consumingmentioning
confidence: 99%