Social Activity of Contemporary Ukrainian Society: Threat to Internal Stability or Possibility of Social Dialogue

Abstract

The article substantiates the social nature of the dichotomy of contemporary postmodern society through the analysis of the social content of possible forms of social activity. Using the terminology of S. Deetz’s theory of communication, the authors substantiate that today in Ukrainian society there are three main forms of social activity - consent; involvement; participation. The dominance of a certain form of social dialogue in society determines the nature, dynamics, direction, spatial and temporal social activity limitations. The results of an empirical study on the distribution of forms of social activity in contemporary Ukrainian society are presented. Emphasis is placed on the fact that one of the conditions for reducing the social destructiveness of postmodern society is the value context of social dialogue as a manifestation of social activity that regulates relations between social groups. In postmodern society, there is a multiplicity of variations of social interaction. The social nature of the constructive social activity of contemporary Ukrainian society “lies” in the plane of “social interaction - social dialogue - social trust”. Effective (constructive) social interaction between certain social groups (especially those which have the ability and desire to influence social processes actively) leads to the formation of new social relations, that, in turn, form opportunities for social dialogue between them. This dialogue influences the evolution (progressive reforming) of the structural organization of society, which is a prerequisite for the stability of society, decreasing its potential social destructiveness (especially in a situation of social challenges).

Social anxiety of the citizens of Kazakhstan: The dynamics of change and its impact on public consciousness

“…The modernity manifests not only as a sociohistorical state but also as the emergence of diverse and shifting threats and fears that correspond to the model of socioeconomic, political, and cultural development. Culture and mentality enter into scenarios of uncertainty in the ways of thinking that exist in the contexts of subjects (Yereskova et al, 2020). The society of intervention coexists with the society of knowledge, and knowledge and information are the new instruments of power.…”

Futurology of Separatism and National Security: Being vs Dissipation

“…The conviction that the vast majority of people in Donbass wanted secession from Ukraine did not have any valid basis. As the Ukrainian researchers have accurately described, all contemporary events are based on the dichotomy of perception and social reality (Yereskova et al, 2020). That conclusion was based on the sociological studies presented and formed an existential situation, even for one of the authors of the article, who lived in Donetsk at that time and was a witness of the events.…”

Anthropological Ideas in the Prose of the Ukrainian Diaspora: Traditions and Postmodernism

“…Thus, one can observe the influence of a caste system on personality development, as well as the axiological concept through the prism of moralethical regulations, expressed in the antithetical aspects of good and evil (Gray, 2008). As rightly noted by Yereskova et al (2020), postmodernism aims to reconcile various forms of practice, as well as social and mental habits, with new forms of societal life, which coexist and sometimes contradict each other (p. 145).…”