Futurology of Separatism and National Security: Being vs Dissipation

Abstract

The peculiarities of the “domestic” and political worlds’ interactions as well as their impact on the freedom of human choice are considered in the article. The purpose of the article is to analyze political and existential being which can be transformed in the light of collecting or distracting way. The phenomenon of national security is analyzed in theoretical as well as in practical dimension. The first part of the study of separatism is connected with the modern social world’s tendency of social transgression which involves blurring the rules and limits expansion. The frontier concept as the transgressive space, which can be embodied in the form of possibility of political interaction or as a place of a political conflict, is offered. Frontier understanding in the light of a cultural dialogue permits to consider it as a perspective dynamic system in the social projects of common being construction. The second part of the article reveals three main directions of transgression: philosophical and reflexive, ethical and normative, common practices. An idea of correlation between freedom of choice, manifestation of will with the human ability of critical thinking, reflection is offered and proved. Tolerance is defined to be the strategical practice in the process of launching a dialogue program of conflicting political communication.

Legal and Economic Foundations of the National Security of Ukraine: State and Prospects

“…Within the framework of philosophical consideration of the essence of separatism, as one of the negative counterbalances to the national security of any modern country, it is pointed out that in the nature of this category of manifestations of such a trend of social being in the modern world as social transgression, which involves the leveling of certain cultural values, normative rules, moral foundations within the appropriate national boundaries (Levyk et al, 2021). At the same time, the roots of separatism can be traced in the interaction of the everyday and political world of the individual and society, in the juxtaposition of the categories of "social transgression," "frontier".…”