2016
DOI: 10.17736/ijope.2016.ak08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Simulations of Dam-Break Flows Around Movable Structures

Abstract: In this paper, 3D weakly compressible and incompressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (WCSPH & ISPH) models are used to study dam-break flows impacting on either a fixed or a movable structure. First, the two models' performances are compared in terms of CPU time efficiency and numerical accuracy, as well as the water surface shapes and pressure fields. Then, they are applied to investigate dambreak flow interactions with structures placed in the path of the flood. The study found that the ISPH modelling ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total simulation time is 6 s. Figure 5a,b shows the time history of water depth variations at gauging point H2 and H4, compared between the present SWE-SPH computations and benchmark data of Kleefsman et al [21]. The agreement between the two is quite promising, which seems even better than the 3D WCSPH/ISPH computations carried out by Jian et al [22]. One possible reason could be that the present channel bed is rough, while this was not taken into consideration in the 3D ISPH model.…”
Section: Dam Break Flow Interaction With a Rectangular Obstaclementioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The total simulation time is 6 s. Figure 5a,b shows the time history of water depth variations at gauging point H2 and H4, compared between the present SWE-SPH computations and benchmark data of Kleefsman et al [21]. The agreement between the two is quite promising, which seems even better than the 3D WCSPH/ISPH computations carried out by Jian et al [22]. One possible reason could be that the present channel bed is rough, while this was not taken into consideration in the 3D ISPH model.…”
Section: Dam Break Flow Interaction With a Rectangular Obstaclementioning
confidence: 59%
“…To support this, for the dam break flow over a triangular hump [19], the present SWE-SPH computations are compared with the numerical results of Zhou et al [23] using a high-resolution Godunov-type cut-cell scheme. For the dam break flow over a rectangular obstacle [21], the VOF results of Kleefsman et al [21] and 3D ISPH results of Jian et al [22] are compared. [19], which demonstrate that the SWE-SPH computations are generally better than the numerical results of Zhou et al [23] especially at gauging points G10 and G13.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Numerical Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Schwaiger's approach requires the inverse operations of the matrices H −1 ββ and Γ ij at each fluid particle, so it could cost a little more in computational expenses. The original formulation was developed for the thermal diffusion solutions, and Jian et al [36] used this for the fluid-structure interactions in their ISPH approach. Oger et al [37] studied a wide range of the correction procedures to improve the accuracy of kernel approximations and they proposed a renormalization technique from the discrete version of the Eulerian equations.…”
Section: Schwaiger Form Viscosity Force Model-03 (Visc-03)mentioning
confidence: 99%