2009
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoke-free policies and the social acceptability of smoking in Uruguay and Mexico: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
76
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(19 reference statements)
7
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Past research suggest that attitudes change in favor of a policy after its implementation (Diepeveen et al, 2013;Fong et al, 2006;Hilton et al, 2007;Thrasher, Boado, Sebrié, & Bianco, 2009;Thrasher, Pérez-Hernández, Swayampakala, Arillo-Santillán, & Bottai, 2010). This suggests that implementing a policy measure in one domain may increase the acceptance of the same policy measure in another domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research suggest that attitudes change in favor of a policy after its implementation (Diepeveen et al, 2013;Fong et al, 2006;Hilton et al, 2007;Thrasher, Boado, Sebrié, & Bianco, 2009;Thrasher, Pérez-Hernández, Swayampakala, Arillo-Santillán, & Bottai, 2010). This suggests that implementing a policy measure in one domain may increase the acceptance of the same policy measure in another domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, Mexico successfully implemented pictorial warning label requirements for cigarette packaging and an increase in cigarettes tax, which might have contributed to reduction in population level cigarette consumption (Saenz-deMiera et al, 2010;World Health Organization, 2011). However, implementations of smoke-free policies and cessation support services have been relatively ineffective and weak (Borland et al, 2012;Thrasher, Boado, Sebrie, & Bianco, 2009). For example, a population-based survey of smokers conducted in 15 countries, including 5 middle-income countries, found that Mexico rated among the worst in access to smoking cessation counseling from medical providers, and Mexican smokers had no access to telephone quitlines (Borland et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants in the post-market sample were randomly selected from seven cities (Mexico City, Monterrey, Guadalajara, Puebla, Tijuana, Mérida, and Léon) using a stratified, multistage sampling strategy with face-to-face interviews. 13 Within the urban limits of seven cities, census tracts and then block groups were selected with likelihood of selection proportional to the number of households according to census data. Households were selected in random order and visited up for four times to enumerate household members and recruit eligible adult smokers (who had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and smoked at least once a week).…”
Section: Sample and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%