Predictive and External Validity of a Pre-Market Study to Determine the Most Effective Pictorial Health Warning Label Content for Cigarette Packages

Abstract

Introduction: Studies examining cigarette package pictorial health warning label (HWL) content have primarily used designs that do not allow determination of effectiveness after repeated, naturalistic exposure. This research aimed to determine the predictive and external validity of a premarket evaluation study of pictorial HWLs. Methods: Data were analyzed from: (1) a pre-market convenience sample of 544 adult smokers who participated in field experiments in Mexico City before pictorial HWL implementation (September 2010); and (2) a post-market population-based representative sample of 1765 adult smokers in the Mexican administration of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey after pictorial HWL implementation. Participants in both samples rated six HWLs that appeared on cigarette packs, and also ranked HWLs with four different themes. Mixed effects models were estimated for each sample to assess ratings of relative effectiveness for the six HWLs, and to assess which HWL themes were ranked as the most effective. Results: Pre-and post-market data showed similar relative ratings across the six HWLs, with the least and most effective HWLs consistently differentiated from other HWLs. Models predicting rankings of HWL themes in post-market sample indicated: (1) pictorial HWLs were ranked as more effective than text-only HWLs; (2) HWLs with both graphic and "lived experience" content outperformed symbolic content; and, (3) testimonial content significantly outperformed didactic content. Pre-market data showed a similar pattern of results, but with fewer statistically significant findings. Conclusions:The study suggests well-designed pre-market studies can have predictive and external validity, helping regulators select HWL content.

Cigarette flavors, package shape, and cigarette brand perceptions: an experiment among young Brazilian women

“…Furthermore, participants were shown images of packs through an online interface, which may not adequately simulate naturalistic exposure to tangible packaging. However, studies examining other aspects of tobacco packaging (e.g., cigarette warning labels) have produced consistent results across experiments that present images of warnings on computer screens (34) or on physical cigarette packs (35), as well as when assessing consumer responses after warnings are implemented on cigarette packaging (36). Furthermore, the protocols were adapted from those used by the tobacco industry itself (6).…”

Severity and susceptibility: measuring the perceived effectiveness and believability of tobacco health warnings

“…These three effectiveness examples have been found to be highly correlated with questions regarding ‘overall effectiveness’ (Cronbach’s α = 0.97) [ 4 , 6 ]. Believability and effectiveness questions were answered on a visual 1–10 Likert scale, with 1 labelled ‘not at all’ and 10 labelled ‘extremely’ [ 4 , 12 , 18 , 19 ].…”

Assessing Smoking Cessation Messages with a Discrete Choice Experiment

“…Some experimental studies of cigarette warning characteristics have found similar patterns of results across study samples from online panels, purposive samples that target more disadvantaged populations, and population-based representative samples. 18,19,33,80 Nevertheless, this effect may not be found when examining cessation efficacy messages. Indeed, we found some evidence that more disadvantaged populations are more likely not to view any message as helpful or useful.…”