2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart governance in institutional context: An in-depth analysis of Glasgow, Utrecht, and Curitiba

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a theoretical perspective, this research contributes to the recent calls to adopt a socio-technical approach to smart governance (Jiang, 2021;Jiang et al, 2019Jiang et al, , 2020, as the analyzed strategic initiatives transversely include a social component. Furthermore, this research is also consistent with the suggestion of Tomor et al (2021) by empirically contrasting governance patterns in different geographies. Meanwhile, from a public policy perspective, and considering there are only seven Latin American cities included in the Smart City Index 2021 (Bogota, Buenos Aires, Medellin, Mexico City, Rio de Janeiro, San Jose and Santiago) (IMD, 2021), our findings might serve to illuminate development/government programs that integrate ICTs, SDGs and solutions for societal problems not only within Latin American cities but also in other regions with similar institutional characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From a theoretical perspective, this research contributes to the recent calls to adopt a socio-technical approach to smart governance (Jiang, 2021;Jiang et al, 2019Jiang et al, , 2020, as the analyzed strategic initiatives transversely include a social component. Furthermore, this research is also consistent with the suggestion of Tomor et al (2021) by empirically contrasting governance patterns in different geographies. Meanwhile, from a public policy perspective, and considering there are only seven Latin American cities included in the Smart City Index 2021 (Bogota, Buenos Aires, Medellin, Mexico City, Rio de Janeiro, San Jose and Santiago) (IMD, 2021), our findings might serve to illuminate development/government programs that integrate ICTs, SDGs and solutions for societal problems not only within Latin American cities but also in other regions with similar institutional characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, as smart governance as a term is relatively recent, there is a need to further develop this concept and its adaptations in different contexts. In accordance to Ruhlandt (2018) and Tomor et al (2021), we still need a more systematic understanding of the components of smart governance to eventually propose transformative perspectives through empirical research (Jiang, 2021) that compare governance decisions and patterns in different locations (Ranchod, 2020; Tomor et al , 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three main components of the smart governance dimension are societal goals, collaboration and technologies (Tomor et al 2021).…”
Section: Smart Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing research explores multi-layered institutional influencing arguing that institutions on multiple scales interact and alter each other's impact on the smart governance. These interactive dynamics logically determine the institutional factors shaping smart governance in diverse city contexts [36,37]. Smart governance is citizen centric [38] and citizens are vital drivers of urban transformation actively engaging in all processes [39].…”
Section: Involvement Of Various Actors In Urban Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%