2015
DOI: 10.1134/s0038094615050068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small impact craters in the polar regions of the Moon: Peculiarities of morphometric characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the statistical test confirms the differences in d/D ratios between the two groups of craters. Our results support those obtained by Stopar et al [40], Fassett et al [58], and Kokhanov et al [8], who used a different source DTM and included craters smaller than 200 m in diameter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the statistical test confirms the differences in d/D ratios between the two groups of craters. Our results support those obtained by Stopar et al [40], Fassett et al [58], and Kokhanov et al [8], who used a different source DTM and included craters smaller than 200 m in diameter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In polar regions, PSRs can be excellent cold trap candidates (Kokhanov et al [8] and Rubanenko et al [9]). Due to the low inclination of the spin axis of the Moon relative to the ecliptic (1.54 • ) and the extremely high topography in its south pole, PSRs can become excellent cold traps where ice might be present (Paige et al [10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might seem at odds with remote sensing observations suggesting low amounts of ice (usually 0–5%) in the upper few meters of regolith (e.g., Colaprete et al, 2010; Teodoro et al, 2014). However, Kokhanov et al (2015), followed by Rubanenko et al (2019), used morphometry measurements of small polar craters and suggested significant ice‐rich deposits of up to 50 m thick, particularly at the south pole (Rubanenko et al, 2019). As Cannon and Britt (2020) showed, impact gardening should lead to a desiccated ice‐poor zone in the upper ~50 cm of regolith, which could explain why neutron spectroscopy measurements generally show low hydrogen concentrations inside cold traps (e.g., Teodoro et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface ice detected by the Lyman‐Alpha Mapping Project has been interpreted as thin transient frosts (Farrell et al, 2019; Hayne et al, 2015), but detections from Li et al (2018) using the Moon Mineralogy Mapper instrument could represent deposits thicker than mere frost. Most studies have interpreted measurements from the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS), neutron spectroscopy, and radar as low concentrations of shallow subsurface ice (Campbell & Campbell, 2006; Colaprete et al, 2010; Teodoro et al, 2014; Thomson et al, 2012), although others have interpreted radar signatures (Spudis et al, 2013) and unusually shallow polar craters (Kokhanov et al, 2015; Rubanenko et al, 2019) to favor thicker Mercury‐like (i.e., meter‐thick) ice layers buried under or mixed within regolith. These differing interpretations present challenges for selecting instruments to further study polar volatiles and for resource prospecting and extraction efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated values are used for analysis of crater degradation and properties of the upper surface layer. Implementations of this tool in research (Kokhanov et al, 2015) shows, that small relatively fresh craters in the lunar polar areas have a significantly lower depth-to-diameter ratio than their counterparts in typical non-polar highlands. Also this tool could be used for the other solid celestial bodies.…”
Section: Small Crater Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%