2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slip mode dependency of dislocation shearing and looping of precipitates in Mg alloy WE43

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…indicates that the twins are { 101 ̅ 1 }< 112 ̅ 0 > compression twins [28]. [33]. From the present TEM observations, it can be deduced that during HPT processing the nanosized β′ precipitates are sheared by many dislocations and eventually decompose.…”
Section: Microstructure Evolution After Hpt Processingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…indicates that the twins are { 101 ̅ 1 }< 112 ̅ 0 > compression twins [28]. [33]. From the present TEM observations, it can be deduced that during HPT processing the nanosized β′ precipitates are sheared by many dislocations and eventually decompose.…”
Section: Microstructure Evolution After Hpt Processingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Precipitate shearing by dislocations is normally found in the case of coherent precipitates ; the matrix dislocation enters the precipitate through the coherent interface and slips along the most suitable slip plane. This phenomenon is most clear when the matrix and the precipitate share the same crystallographic lattice (for instance, γ precipitates in a γ matrix in Ni-based superalloys [57] or Guinier-Preston zones in Al-Cu alloys [29]) but it has also been reported in the case of basal dislocations with β precipitates in Mg-RE alloys [58,59]. Under these circumstances, the CRSS necessary to shear the precipitate depends on the coherency strain, the modulus mismatch, the chemical strengthening and, in the case of ordered precipitates, on the energy penalty due to the formation of antiphase boundaries [60].…”
Section: Dislocation/precipitate Interaction Mechanisms At Finite Temmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The presence of dislocation pile-ups before precipitate shearing has also been experimentally reported in Mg-Al [20] and Mg-Nd [64], supporting our atomistic results. It should be also noted that precipitate shearing in Mg alloys by either prismatic or pyramidal dislocations was not observed because of the lack of crystallographic continuity between the corresponding slip planes in the matrix and in the precipitate [59]. Thus, the strength of Mg alloys is limited by the low CRSS for basal slip, which is always the main plastic deformation mechanism.…”
Section: Dislocation/precipitate Interaction Mechanisms At Finite Temmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9c) by basal dislocations. Nevertheless, precipitate shearing in Mg alloys by either prismatic or pyramidal dislocations has not been observed because of the lack of crystallographic continuity between the corresponding slip planes in the matrix and in the precipitate [45].…”
Section: Interaction Mechanisms Of Basal Dislocations With # Precipitmentioning
confidence: 99%