2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between basal dislocations and β1 precipitates in Mg–4Zn alloy: Mechanisms and strengthening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these models were able to rationalize some of the experimental trends, it should be noticed that the Orowan model assumes a very simplistic approach for the dislocation/precipitate interaction: the precipitates are rigid obstacles overcome by dislocations by the formation of an Orowan loop. Nevertheless, recent micropillar compression tests in Mg-5 wt% Zn alloys [17,18] have shown evidence of precipitate shearing basal dislocations and similar results were found in transmission electron microscopy observations of dislocation/precipitate interactions in Mg-Al alloys [19,20]. Thus, simulations at smaller length scales (either using dislocation dynamics [21][22][23][24] or molecular mechanics [22,[25][26][27][28][29]) are required to get a better understanding of the physics and to develop more accurate models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Although these models were able to rationalize some of the experimental trends, it should be noticed that the Orowan model assumes a very simplistic approach for the dislocation/precipitate interaction: the precipitates are rigid obstacles overcome by dislocations by the formation of an Orowan loop. Nevertheless, recent micropillar compression tests in Mg-5 wt% Zn alloys [17,18] have shown evidence of precipitate shearing basal dislocations and similar results were found in transmission electron microscopy observations of dislocation/precipitate interactions in Mg-Al alloys [19,20]. Thus, simulations at smaller length scales (either using dislocation dynamics [21][22][23][24] or molecular mechanics [22,[25][26][27][28][29]) are required to get a better understanding of the physics and to develop more accurate models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The critical resolved shear stress for twinning (CRSStwinning), calculated as the product between the yield strength (195 MPa) and SFtwinning, amounts to 96 MPa. This value is significantly higher than that measured in pure Mg by single crystal studies, which amounts approximately to 12 MPa [72], and by micropillar studies, which range from 20 to 70 MPa.…”
Section: Refcontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Mg Alloy (wt.%) CRSSbasal (MPa) [155] Pure Mg (Single cristal) 4 [158] Pure Mg (Micropillar) 6 [71] Mg-1Mn-1Nd, aged (Micropillar, prismatic plates) 31 [157] Mg-5Gd-2Y-0.3Zr, aged (Micropillar, prismatic disks) 35 [72] Mg-5Zn, aged 149ºC (Micropillar, c-axis rods) 55 [72] Mg-5Zn, aged 204ºC (Micropillar, c-axis rods) In the following, the micromechanical study conducted in grain 2, in which the basal plane forms an angle of 84° with respect to the compression axis, and where therefore twinning is expected to be the main strain carrier upon yielding (SF twinning = 0.4933), will be described. In this grain, the compression axis is close to the [01-10] direction.…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is caused by the block dislocation motion of the precipitated phases, which determines the strength of the alloy. Experiments show that the dislocations overcome the precipitates by shearing [ 8–10 ] and Orowan‐bypassing mechanism. [ 11,12 ] As the precipitate size increases, the Orowan strengthening effect decreases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%