2018
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2018.2793940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sliding Mode Boundary Control of an Euler–Bernoulli Beam Subject to Disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, to prove the reaching condition, considering the Lyapunov function be V s (s) = 1 2 S 2 (t), taking the derivative of the Lyapunov function V s (t) and substituting (28) into the derivative of Vs (t) together with…”
Section: Sliding Mode Boundary Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, to prove the reaching condition, considering the Lyapunov function be V s (s) = 1 2 S 2 (t), taking the derivative of the Lyapunov function V s (t) and substituting (28) into the derivative of Vs (t) together with…”
Section: Sliding Mode Boundary Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, the sliding mode boundary control for exponential stabilization of the distributed parameter system modeled by the PDEs with boundary external disturbance has also become an attractive research area. 27,28 The sliding mode boundary control for exponential stabilization of cascaded system combining distributed parameter systems and lumped parameter systems with Neumann/mixed boundary conditions and external boundary disturbance has been analyzed by means of sliding mode control method and backstepping techniques. 29,30 The sliding mode control achieve the sliding mode on the sliding manifold within a finite time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where µ is the mass per unit length and i 2 and i 3 are the second moments of inertia of the beam's cross-section. For such uncoupled cases, the classical linear Euler-Bernoulli beam description [24] is recovered by setting both the axial and shear stiffness EA, GA 3 → ∞ and removing all quadratic terms in (1)- (2). The much-studied Timoshenko model [25], is analogously obtained, but with GA 3 finite.…”
Section: Intrinsic Beam Equations and Standard Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems of controlling the coefficient function in the beam equation have been investigated in [2][3][4][5]. The boundary control problems for the beam system have been studied in [6][7][8][9][10][11]. When the control function is the source term, there have been some control problems [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%