1992
DOI: 10.1159/000177726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skinfold Thickness at Ulnar, Triceps, Subscapular, and Suprailiac Regions in 1,656 Japanese Children Aged 3-11 Years

Abstract: We measured body weight, height, and skinfold thickness (SFT) at ulnar, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac regions in 1,656 Japanese children aged 3-11 years. Means of SFT in boys and girls with normal weight exhibited similar changes with age to Caucasian children. However, nadirs of SFT were observed 1 year earlier and means at 11 years were slightly higher in Japanese. Correlation coefficients between SFT and excess weight (EW) were high in boys and girls when EW was more than 10 %. Some children with EW o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DISCUSSION Subcutaneous fatness during childhood and adolescence changes in relation to pubertal maturation in girls and perhaps relative to obesity (Tanner and Whitehouse, 1975;Malina and Bouchard, 1988;Ohzeki et al, 1992). Skinfold thicknesses are rather easy to measure and have been applied for children and adolescents (Tanner and Whitehouse, 1975;Ohzeki et al, 1992;Hanaki et al, 1992). Measurement of arm fat and muscle (non-fat) areas are reported to be useful to assess adiposity as well as muscle volumes in the limbs (Frisancho, 1981;Lerner et al, 1986).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DISCUSSION Subcutaneous fatness during childhood and adolescence changes in relation to pubertal maturation in girls and perhaps relative to obesity (Tanner and Whitehouse, 1975;Malina and Bouchard, 1988;Ohzeki et al, 1992). Skinfold thicknesses are rather easy to measure and have been applied for children and adolescents (Tanner and Whitehouse, 1975;Ohzeki et al, 1992;Hanaki et al, 1992). Measurement of arm fat and muscle (non-fat) areas are reported to be useful to assess adiposity as well as muscle volumes in the limbs (Frisancho, 1981;Lerner et al, 1986).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skinfold thicknesses (SFT) were measured by a single observer using a Holtain caliper at the ulnar (at a point halfway be- tween the olecranon and styloidal processes of ulna), triceps (at the midpoint between the acromial and olecranon processes), thigh (at midpoints on the anterior thigh between the center of the patella and middle of the inguinal band), and calf (at the posterior calf region where the circumference was maximum) (Tanner and Whitehouse, 1975;Ohzeki et al, 1992Ohzeki et al, ,1995. Circumferences were measured with a tape measure a t the same points for the skinfold measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because it is not so easy to evaluate specifically volume of fat tissue (Ohzeki et al, 1992;Tsukuda et al, 1994), body weight and some indices for overweight (RollandCachera et al, 1982;Ohzeki et al, 1989Ohzeki et al, ,1990) are commonly applied to estimate body fatness instead of measurement of adipose volume. Serum leptin levels are influenced by age and=or sex predominantly, but not completely, through alteration in volume of fat tissue (Blum et al, 1997;Carlsson et al, 1997;Ahmed et al, 1999;Nakanishi et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include BMI, the Rohrer index, degree of obesity relative to ideal body weight, growth curves for height and weight, as well as methods based on body composition, such as measurement of the thickness of subcutaneous fat, the Bioelectrical Impedance (BI) method and the Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) method (Ohzeki et al 1992;Eisenkobl et al 2001). Of these methods, the index of physique is widely used as a primary screening method for obesity because of its ease of calculation.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Criteria For Screening Of Obesitymentioning
confidence: 99%