2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.61.14215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effects in the electrical resistivity of polycrystalline nanowires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

17
177
2
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
17
177
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works reported that for thin films and NWs fabricated with templates or lift-off, the grain size was roughly equal to the structure dimensions. 43,46,47 In our case we did not observe such relation and this could be related to the way structures are deposited in SL. Compared to lift-off or template growth, during SL the material lands freely on the surface without any lateral barrier restricting the spreading of the material or the growth of the structure.…”
contrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous works reported that for thin films and NWs fabricated with templates or lift-off, the grain size was roughly equal to the structure dimensions. 43,46,47 In our case we did not observe such relation and this could be related to the way structures are deposited in SL. Compared to lift-off or template growth, during SL the material lands freely on the surface without any lateral barrier restricting the spreading of the material or the growth of the structure.…”
contrasting
confidence: 77%
“…This was also observed by Durkan et al for Au wires that were not annealed as in our case. 43,45 If this dependence exists, it might be too small to be detected in our experimental conditions and dimensions. In our NWs we did not observe a change in grain size with the width or thickness of the NWs either.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(9) shows the contribution of grain boundary scattering, and the second term shows the contribution of surface scattering. The values of R ¼ 0:9 for Au 19) and R ¼ 0:5 for Cu 11) have been reported. Figure 10 shows a comparison of the resistivity, m , which is measured using four-point probe technique, with calculated resistivity, c , which is obtained by substituting the value of R, l 0 ¼ 40 nm, 11) P ¼ 0:5 (with respect to epitaxial single crystal), 20) 0 ¼ 0:023 m m, 17) and the value of d (crystalline size) into eqs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Mayadas and Shatzkes (MS) [8], based on experimental observations, [9] studied the grain boundary scattering on electric resistivity by extending FS theory. As a basic problem of microscale energy transport, the size effects on the electric resistivity of metallic nanostructures have been widely studied [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Since the thermal conductivity of metals is closely related to their electric conductivity [5,18], the size effect on thermal responses of metals is also an important problem in the field of microscale energy transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction between ultrashort pulse laser and metallic nanostructures involves the nonequilibrium energy exchange between electrons and lattice [1][2][3][4][5] and the size effects [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] occurring in microscale energy transport processes. The nonequilibrium process occurs as the pulse width of the ultrashort pulse laser is comparable to the characteristic time for electrons to change their states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%