2015
DOI: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20150170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sixth Cervical Vertebra with Bilateral Double Foramen Transversarium and Non -bifid Spine : Rare Case.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence identified by Mishra of 24 complete ATFs against only 7 in their incomplete morphology. Such data are correspondent with the description of Gonsai et al (2015) 13 , whose sample presented 40 vertebrae that had the ATF in complete shape, while only 22 were incomplete, and with the analysis of Kumari et al (2015) 15 , in which 22 ATF were complete and only 9 were incomplete. These data contrast with those identified by Esakkiammal and Chauhan (2016) 7 , who described the prevalence of 19 complete morphology ATF and 24 in its incomplete presentation, and with those exposed in the present analysis, since it has described only 19 ATF in its complete morphology and 28 of the accessory transverse foramen as being incomplete.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prevalence identified by Mishra of 24 complete ATFs against only 7 in their incomplete morphology. Such data are correspondent with the description of Gonsai et al (2015) 13 , whose sample presented 40 vertebrae that had the ATF in complete shape, while only 22 were incomplete, and with the analysis of Kumari et al (2015) 15 , in which 22 ATF were complete and only 9 were incomplete. These data contrast with those identified by Esakkiammal and Chauhan (2016) 7 , who described the prevalence of 19 complete morphology ATF and 24 in its incomplete presentation, and with those exposed in the present analysis, since it has described only 19 ATF in its complete morphology and 28 of the accessory transverse foramen as being incomplete.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, Akhtar et al (2015) 12 describes 20 unilateral and 5 bilateral ATFs, just like Gonsai et al (2015) 13 does, identifying 31 unilateral and 9 bilateral, being in correspondence with the findings in the present study (25 vertebrae with unilateral ATF and 11 with bilateral ATF). On the other hand, Esakkiammal and Chauhan (2016) 7 and Mishra et al (2015) 14 reported a more frequent bilaterality in their analysis, with 18 unilateral and 19 bilateral for the first and 10 unilateral and 21 bilateral for the second one (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Yadav Y et al 16 got only 8 (6.67%) cases of double FT among 120 cervical vertebrae, in which 3 were unilateral & 5 were bilateral. A single sixth cervical vertebra with bilateral double foramen FT with non-bifid spine was reported by Mishra GP et al 17 Double foramen transversarium is also known as "foramen transversarium bipartitia". Depending upon the course of vertebral artery it may be unilateral and bilateral.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accessory FT was found more often in the present study as compared to that seen in studies conducted by various authors (Figure 10). Mishra et al studied 220 typical cervical vertebrae and found 31(14.09%) vertebrae had accessory FT. Out of these, 18 (8.1%) were bilateral complete, 6 (2.7%) were unilateral complete, 3 (1.3%) were bilateral incomplete and 4 (1.8%) were unilateral incomplete accessory FT. 17 Accessory FT in the typical cervical vertebrae were seen only in 37 (27.6%) vertebrae in the present study. Out of these, 4 (2.9%) were bilateral complete, 9 (6.7%) were unilateral complete, 6 (4.5%) were bilateral incomplete and 12 (8.9%) were unilateral incomplete.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%