2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-walled carbon nanotubes modified carbon ionic liquid electrode for sensitive electrochemical detection of rutin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Nicholson's equation [27], the values of charge transfer coefficient (α), the electron transfer number (n) and the electrode reaction standard rate constant (k s ) were calculated as 0.294, 1.89 and 2.97 s −1 respectively. The k s value was close to the reported value of 2.35 s −1 on graphene modified GCE [28], and 2.61 s −1 on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) modified CILE [29], indicating that the GO-IL composite exhibited the similar functions with the high conductivity of GR or SWCNTs, and a fast electron transfer between the redox center of rutin and the modified electrode could be achieved.…”
Section: Influence Of Scan Ratesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…According to the Nicholson's equation [27], the values of charge transfer coefficient (α), the electron transfer number (n) and the electrode reaction standard rate constant (k s ) were calculated as 0.294, 1.89 and 2.97 s −1 respectively. The k s value was close to the reported value of 2.35 s −1 on graphene modified GCE [28], and 2.61 s −1 on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) modified CILE [29], indicating that the GO-IL composite exhibited the similar functions with the high conductivity of GR or SWCNTs, and a fast electron transfer between the redox center of rutin and the modified electrode could be achieved.…”
Section: Influence Of Scan Ratesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…[BMIM]BF 4 has been used in the determination of rutin using a carbon ceramic electrode (Zhan et al 2010), or a single walled carbon nanotube modified electrode (Zhu et al 2010) with outstanding results. Moreover, the determination of rutin using PEDOT and [BMIM]BF 4 has not been reported.…”
Section: Electrochemical Behavior Of Rutin Using Different Modified Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type piridinium (Sun et al 2008(Sun et al , 2013a(Sun et al , b, c, 2014 and type imidazolium (Franzoi et al 2009;Zhanga and Zheng 2008;Zhu et al 2010;Zhan et al 2010) ionic liquids have been those most used in the modification of electrodes to determine rutin with detection limits of 2.5 × 10 −9 and 1 × 10 −8 , respectively. The aim of this study is to detect and quantify rutin in real samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other analytical methods, the characteristic advantages of electrochemical methods include its simplicity, high sensitivity, good stability, low-cost instrumentation, small dimensions and on-site monitoring [9]. Because rutin and AA are both electroactive compounds, various electrochemical methods for the individual determination of rutin [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and AA [17][18][19] have been described. However, the oxidation peak potential of AA is very close to that of rutin, which results in poor selectivity determination of rutin in real samples on conventional electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemically modified electrodes have been used to solve this problem. Single-walled carbon nanotubes modified carbon ionic liquid electrode [14], pyridinium-based ionic liquid modified carbon paste electrode [15] and gold nanoparticles/ethylenediamine/carbon nanotube modified glassy carbon electrode [16] have been fabricated and successfully applied in the selective determination of rutin in the presence of a certain concentration of AA. However, simultaneous determination of AA and rutin by voltammetry has not been reported in any literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%