2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous determination of dysprosium and iron in urine by capillary zone electrophoresis coupled to cloud point extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, compared to the results obtained by other authors [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], the present on-line CPE/FIA system had many advantages, such as high sensitivity, high sample throughput, high extraction efficiency and simplicity. Experimental factors which govern the magnitude of the preconcentration factors and the CL intensity were studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, compared to the results obtained by other authors [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], the present on-line CPE/FIA system had many advantages, such as high sensitivity, high sample throughput, high extraction efficiency and simplicity. Experimental factors which govern the magnitude of the preconcentration factors and the CL intensity were studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…When compared to all the reported on-line CPE/FIA papers [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], the key difference/improvement of the present on-line CPE/FIA system was that the collection column served a dual function: (1) to entrap the analyte-containing surfactant aggregates and (2) to provide CL emission (i.e., the collection column was mounted directly adjacent to the detector). Table 1 shows the effects on the CL intensity as a function of the presence (or absence) of the analyte (bilirubin), surfactant (Triton X-114), salting-out agent (Na 2 SO 4 ) and/or filtering material (cotton).…”
Section: Collection Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previous literature review conducted to determine the iron element in various samples by using cloud point extraction method that is coupled with different techniques such as: flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) [12,15,16], UV-visible spectrophotometer [17,18], inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [19], graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry [20] and capillary electrophoresis [21]. The urine has a pH of 5.5-7.0 and a range of 6.2 [22], while the concentration of iron element in the urine is estimated to be about the median and range concentration of iron in urine was 4.9 ng mL -1 and < 2.1-16.4 ng mL -1 [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Many methods have been reported for iron determination including atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), 5 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), 6 inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), 7 high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), 8 and capillary electrophoresis (CE). 9 Most of these methods have good sensitivity but require very expensive instruments and some of them cannot distinguish between the different oxidation states of metals. The spectrophotometry is commonly used for determination of trace of iron is based on the reaction of iron(III) with various chromogenicre agents, such as azo reagents, 10 triphenylmethane reagents, 11 alizarine yellow R, 12 and nitrosonaphthol sodium sulfonates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%