1981
DOI: 10.1016/0308-521x(81)90038-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of production systems in East Africa by use of interfaced forage and cattle models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a generalized model for simulating beef cattle production under a wide range of management schemes and environments with cattle differing widely in genotypes for size, growth and milk production. The model has been used to simulate beef cattle production under a wide range of climatic and management conditions in Guyana (Davis et al, 1976), Colombia (Cartwright et al, 1977), Venezuela (Ordonez, 1978), Botswana (ILCA, 1978), Tanzania (Sullivan et al, 1981), central Texas (Nelsen et al, 1978) and the mid-western United States (Notter et al, 1979a, b, c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a generalized model for simulating beef cattle production under a wide range of management schemes and environments with cattle differing widely in genotypes for size, growth and milk production. The model has been used to simulate beef cattle production under a wide range of climatic and management conditions in Guyana (Davis et al, 1976), Colombia (Cartwright et al, 1977), Venezuela (Ordonez, 1978), Botswana (ILCA, 1978), Tanzania (Sullivan et al, 1981), central Texas (Nelsen et al, 1978) and the mid-western United States (Notter et al, 1979a, b, c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of our simulations emphasized that production adjustments, particularly the adjustments of area of grassland harvested and the possibility to purchase substitutes to on-a) b) farm forage production improve farmers profit under weather variability. These results are corroborated by empirical analysis Mosnier et al 2010) and by simulation studies (Sullivan et al, 1981 ;Gillard and Monypenny, 1990 ;Romera et al , 2005 ;Diaz-Solis et al, 2006 ;Kobayashi et al, 2007;Jouven and Baumont, 2008). However, the highest the cost to buy feed is, the most incentives farmers have to be self sufficient under weather uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Globalement, nous avons observé que tous les éleveurs s'ajustaient aux aléas climatiques en complémentant les animaux (achat de fourrages et de concentrés) et en modifiant la part des surfaces fauchées et que ces aléas affectaient les charges et le revenu des éleveurs. Ces observa-tions confortent les résultats des travaux de simulations : Romera et al (2005) et Jouven et Baumont (2008 mettent en avant l'intérêt de la modification des fauches, Sullivan et al (1981), Gillard et Monypenny (1990) ou Diaz-Solis et al (2006) soulignent les bénéfices apportés par la complémentation en cas de sècheresse dans des environnements semiarides. C'est aussi cette combinaison d'ajustements qui est apparue «optimale» pour les élevages de bovins allaitants du Charolais dans les simulations de Mosnier et al (2009).…”
Section: / Discussion De La Sensibilité Des Exploitations Aux Aléasunclassified