2001
DOI: 10.4314/sajas.v31i2.3832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Index selection of beef cattle for growth and milk production using computer simulation modelling

Abstract: The Texas A&M University (TAMU) Beef Cattle Production model was expanded to include basic concepts of quantitative genetics. The traits simulated were birth weight, yearling weight, mature weight and milk production. The progeny inherited attributes from both the sire and the dam. The incorporation of genetic concepts into the model allowed for the introduction of variation between individuals and generations. This was achieved by interfacing the original model with stochastic genetic subroutines including a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(11 reference statements)
2
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be the cause for the fluctuations in the genetic gain with the increases of generation number. Similar causes were identified by Dzama et al [29] for stochastic simulation studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be the cause for the fluctuations in the genetic gain with the increases of generation number. Similar causes were identified by Dzama et al [29] for stochastic simulation studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The higher genetic gains were obtained in generation 4 onwards might be the effects of specific sire and dam matings in those generations. That sire and dam have a positive effect on increase in genetic gain, were reported by Dzama et al [29]; Andabi and Moran [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The annual rate of genetic gain for fat and protein yield had no significant differences, between cows and bulls, but for liveweight and longevity, the breeding bulls were higher than cows in both PAT and PT breeding schemes in all selection objectives. Similar results were reported by Dzama et al (2001) for the response of liveweight.…”
Section: Responses Of Different Traits In Cows Vs Bullssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Higher genetic gains obtained in particular years might be due to the effects of sires and dams in those years. Genetic potentiality of parents was then passed on to the progeny, leading to higher genetic gains in the upcoming generation (Dzama et al 2001). For breeding bulls, a comparatively lower rate of genetic gain was achieved compared with cows under PAT and PT breeding schemes for all three selection objectives of all the traits.…”
Section: Shape Of the Curves For Responses Of Different Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neste caso, os índices de seleção restritos poderiam ser utilizados com mais sucesso (Rosa et al, 1979;Atchley et al, 1997;Dzama et al, 2001). Brown et al (1976) destacaram que a taxa de maturidade (k) poderia ser o único parâmetro disponível para o trabalho da indústria.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified