2010
DOI: 10.20870/productions-animales.2010.23.1.3290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Évolution et sensibilité aux aléas des résultats technico-économiques des exploitations de bovins allaitants selon les profils de production

Abstract: Les éleveurs de bovins sont confrontés à une évolution continue du contexte socio-économique et à des conditions climatiques et économiques aléatoires. Nous cherchons à déterminer à travers une analyse statistique si des exploitations disposant de plus grandes sources de flexibilité sont moins sensibles à ces aléas et si leurs revenus moyens s’en ressentent. A partir des données technico-économiques d’un panel de 55 exploitations du bassin Charolais sur la période 1987-2007, n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of our simulations emphasized that production adjustments, particularly the adjustments of area of grassland harvested and the possibility to purchase substitutes to on-a) b) farm forage production improve farmers profit under weather variability. These results are corroborated by empirical analysis Mosnier et al 2010) and by simulation studies (Sullivan et al, 1981 ;Gillard and Monypenny, 1990 ;Romera et al , 2005 ;Diaz-Solis et al, 2006 ;Kobayashi et al, 2007;Jouven and Baumont, 2008). However, the highest the cost to buy feed is, the most incentives farmers have to be self sufficient under weather uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of our simulations emphasized that production adjustments, particularly the adjustments of area of grassland harvested and the possibility to purchase substitutes to on-a) b) farm forage production improve farmers profit under weather variability. These results are corroborated by empirical analysis Mosnier et al 2010) and by simulation studies (Sullivan et al, 1981 ;Gillard and Monypenny, 1990 ;Romera et al , 2005 ;Diaz-Solis et al, 2006 ;Kobayashi et al, 2007;Jouven and Baumont, 2008). However, the highest the cost to buy feed is, the most incentives farmers have to be self sufficient under weather uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Two kinds of risks can be anticipated: embedded risk which occurs when farmers plan to adjust their decisions following the realization of an uncertain event, and, nonembedded risk if risks are expected to affect profit but without real possibility for the farmer to reduce their impacts a posteriori (see also Hardaker et al, 2004). Previous works (Mosnier et al, 2009 andMosnier et al, 2010) emphasized that grassland yield shocks in the French Charolais area involve many adjustments of the production systems, namely adjustments of animal diet composition, of feed product trade and haymaking. Consequently, bimonthly decisions are differentiated after the realisation of the weather event.…”
Section: Farmers Time and Risk Anticipationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farmers may change their management to prevent such low production over a long period. Farmers tend to adapt their herd management over time to respond to severe disturbances or in anticipation of a long-lasting one (Mosnier et al, 2009(Mosnier et al, , 2010. Adaptation may consist of increasing purchases of animals and reducing culling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modeling approach complements observational studies by enabling an ex-ante evaluation of the resilience of a farming system to disturbances. Observational studies highlight possible options available to farmers to adapt their farming system to disturbances (Lemery et al, 2005;Dedieu and Ingrand, 2010) or to evaluate technical and economic results (Liénard et al, 2002;Mosnier et al, 2010). Modeling allows herd dynamics with different initial situations to be evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that the resilience of the five systems would differ regarding the type of hazard considered (Carpenter et al 2014) so that addressing the resilience to climate and workforce hazard remains of high interest. To analyse the effects of climatic hazards, an option would be to work with long time series on a wide range of farms (Mosnier et al 2014) or to simulate climate hazard scenarios based on past weather series data (Joly et al 2018). It would be particularly interesting to try identifying possible relationships between the three technical variables that drive income SD in this study, as these could be affected by climatic hazards through a change in the types and growth patterns of feed resources.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Other Hazards and Opportunities Offered By Public Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%