2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and validation of a spatially evolving turbulent boundary layer up to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
102
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
15
102
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the reasons is the cost of the numerical simulation of developing boundary layers. To the authors' knowledge, the current highest Reynolds number ranges achieved, based on the momentum thickness θ, are Re θ = 13 320-15 489 (a relatively short Reynolds number range) for the direct numerical simulation of a compressible M ∞ = 2 boundary layer by Pirozzoli & Bernardini (2013), Re θ = 2780-6650 for an incompressible boundary layer DNS (direct numerical simulation) by Sillero et al (2011), Re θ = 180-8300 for a very well-resolved incompressible WRLES (wall-resolved large eddy simulation) by Eitel-Amor, Örlü & Schlatter (2014), and Re θ = 3060-13 650 for a WRLES by Deck et al (2014b) at such a low Mach number that it may be considered incompressible. The latter simulation is used in the present study.…”
Section: T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons is the cost of the numerical simulation of developing boundary layers. To the authors' knowledge, the current highest Reynolds number ranges achieved, based on the momentum thickness θ, are Re θ = 13 320-15 489 (a relatively short Reynolds number range) for the direct numerical simulation of a compressible M ∞ = 2 boundary layer by Pirozzoli & Bernardini (2013), Re θ = 2780-6650 for an incompressible boundary layer DNS (direct numerical simulation) by Sillero et al (2011), Re θ = 180-8300 for a very well-resolved incompressible WRLES (wall-resolved large eddy simulation) by Eitel-Amor, Örlü & Schlatter (2014), and Re θ = 3060-13 650 for a WRLES by Deck et al (2014b) at such a low Mach number that it may be considered incompressible. The latter simulation is used in the present study.…”
Section: T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control action is analyzed via direct numerical simulations (DNS) with the pseudo-spectral code SIMSON [12], which gives a high numerical accuracy. The same code has been used in several works by this group, both for simulations of laminar/transitional boundary layers [16] and turbulent flows [15].…”
Section: Flow Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…database d corresponding to published results of Eitel-Amor et al 34 The data from the station corresponding to Re θ = 7,000 was used as an input to the synthetic inflow turbulence generator. We validated this technique for a turbulent boundary layer at Re θ = 31,000 and M ∞ = 0.9, which showed reasonable agreement with the experiments of De Graaff & Eaton.…”
Section: Inflow Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Sensitivity of the inflow turbulence generation technique to the correlation length and time scales (L n and U n ) was performed for the same flow conditions as the hump simulations for the upstream flat plate without the hump, and its effect was not significant on the mean statistics of the developed turbulent boundary layer. The turbulent statistics in the boundary layer upstream of the hump at x/c = -0.5 is compared to resolved LES data of Eitel-Amor et al 34 at Re θ = 7,000 in Figure 5. Note that the first grid point in viscous units is ∆y + ∼ 72 and 36 for the coarse and fine grids and both the first and third point lie within the log layer region of the boundary layer.…”
Section: Inflow Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%