2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10750.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplifying likelihood ratios

Abstract: Likelihood ratios are one of the best measures of diagnostic accuracy, although they are seldom used, because interpreting them requires a calculator to convert back and forth between “probability” and “odds” of disease. This article describes a simpler method of interpreting likelihood ratios, one that avoids calculators, nomograms, and conversions to “odds” of disease. Several examples illustrate how the clinician can use this method to refine diagnostic decisions at the bedside.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
607
2
19

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 771 publications
(671 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
14
607
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…These values suggest that negative results of FDG-PET could not be used alone as a justification (McGee, 2002). False-negative and the unsatisfactory sensitivity may be given in following conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values suggest that negative results of FDG-PET could not be used alone as a justification (McGee, 2002). False-negative and the unsatisfactory sensitivity may be given in following conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this analysis is rarely used, it has more important benefits than sensitivity and specificity measurements alone and is the best way of measuring and expressing diagnostic accuracy. LR analysis can also be used for mental health screening instruments (Akobeng, 2006;Attia, 2003;McGee, 2002;Schmitz, Kruse & Tress, 2002;Sonis, 1999).…”
Section: The Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding raises the possibility that an embryo with a low probability of implantation does not influence or minimally influences the chemical profile of the medium. Likelihood ratios were calculated for assessing the value of performing a diagnostic test, by measuring sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96) (McGee 2002, Kentsis et al 2012. The calibration likelihood ratios for positive and negative were zero.…”
Section: Data Analysis Of Mass Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four samples of equilibrated culture medium without embryos were used as controls and were analyzed by the previously developed multivariate method as a check test, besides the calibration or validation set. Likelihood ratios were calculated for assessing the value of performing a diagnostic test, by measuring sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values (McGee 2002, Kentsis et al 2012.…”
Section: Multivariate Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%