1992
DOI: 10.1016/s1045-1056(05)80043-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple In Vivo bioassay without radioisotopes for recombinant human erythropoietins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical requirements for assay validity, that is, significant regression and no significant deviation from linearity or parallelism of the log dose-log response lines (28), were fully met. The combination of two or three independent assays using a three-fold dose interval and eight animals per dose yielded lower confidence intervals than those reported in previous studies (14,16,17). This provides evidence that manual counts of reticulocytes can generate a valid assay with improved precision, albeit in a labor-intensive format.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The statistical requirements for assay validity, that is, significant regression and no significant deviation from linearity or parallelism of the log dose-log response lines (28), were fully met. The combination of two or three independent assays using a three-fold dose interval and eight animals per dose yielded lower confidence intervals than those reported in previous studies (14,16,17). This provides evidence that manual counts of reticulocytes can generate a valid assay with improved precision, albeit in a labor-intensive format.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The suitability of male or female mice has been investigated previously (3,13,15,17), but the results obtained with females in the present study were more precise and reproducible, with lower variability in the selected linear portion of the dose-response curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations