2019
DOI: 10.1049/joe.2018.9269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple control strategy for a PV‐battery system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To eliminate the communication requirement and dependency, localized controls have been proposed in the literature. A simple yet most common local control of residential BESS has used excess PV power to charge the BESS and discharge when PV generation is low or zero in Barcellona et al (2019). The methodology proposed does not provide battery degradation analysis and considers full discharge of the battery, which is impractical and can affect the battery's health in real scenarios.…”
Section: Localized Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate the communication requirement and dependency, localized controls have been proposed in the literature. A simple yet most common local control of residential BESS has used excess PV power to charge the BESS and discharge when PV generation is low or zero in Barcellona et al (2019). The methodology proposed does not provide battery degradation analysis and considers full discharge of the battery, which is impractical and can affect the battery's health in real scenarios.…”
Section: Localized Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows that the red line is for the use of the ZETA converter with FPAO-FLC control under PV tracking conditions, the blue line is for the use of the ZETA converter with FPAO-FLC control under the PV tracking condition, the green line is for the use of SCC in the PV fixed condition, the purple line is for use The comparison of the average battery charging current in the six-day data collection above between the use of a ZETA converter with FPAO-FLC control and a solar charge controller resulted in an increase in PV tracking conditions reaching 16.45% with a peak current of 3.75 A, while the increase obtained in fixed PV conditions reached 2.43% with a peak current of 2.11 A. PV using FPSO-FLC control has a SOC greater than using PI control [25].…”
Section: Hardware Realizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This scenario uses two emulation cabinets (PV and load), and a portion of the second-life battery (5 kWh). In the base case, the battery follows a basic self-consumption control [14] with the addition of security grid charges after the battery remains in minimum State of Charge (SoC) for a specific time. This avoids having the battery in low values of SoC for too long, which can accelerate the degradation.…”
Section: Prosumer Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%