2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicone Arthroplasty for Nonrheumatic Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
14
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Though our sample size is small to comment on differential outcomes of MCP arthroplasty in the setting of post-traumatic or osteoarthritis, we did note a substantially increased risk of fracture and coronal plane deformity in these populations, as well as markedly higher implant failure in the post-traumatic arthritis group. This is in contradiction to previous studies that have demonstrated excellent outcomes with regards to pain relief and motion at intermediate and long-term follow-up in this non-inflammatory population (Morrell and Weiss, 2018; Namdari and Weiss, 2009; Neral et al., 2013; Rettig et al., 2005). Fracture rates for silicone implants in these populations have been quoted between 0%–11%, with an average follow-up between 47–56 months, where determination of fracture was based on review of radiographs without specific criteria for fracture identification (Namdari and Weiss, 2009; Neral et al., 2013).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though our sample size is small to comment on differential outcomes of MCP arthroplasty in the setting of post-traumatic or osteoarthritis, we did note a substantially increased risk of fracture and coronal plane deformity in these populations, as well as markedly higher implant failure in the post-traumatic arthritis group. This is in contradiction to previous studies that have demonstrated excellent outcomes with regards to pain relief and motion at intermediate and long-term follow-up in this non-inflammatory population (Morrell and Weiss, 2018; Namdari and Weiss, 2009; Neral et al., 2013; Rettig et al., 2005). Fracture rates for silicone implants in these populations have been quoted between 0%–11%, with an average follow-up between 47–56 months, where determination of fracture was based on review of radiographs without specific criteria for fracture identification (Namdari and Weiss, 2009; Neral et al., 2013).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contradiction to previous studies that have demonstrated excellent outcomes with regards to pain relief and motion at intermediate and long-term follow-up in this non-inflammatory population (Morrell and Weiss, 2018; Namdari and Weiss, 2009; Neral et al., 2013; Rettig et al., 2005). Fracture rates for silicone implants in these populations have been quoted between 0%–11%, with an average follow-up between 47–56 months, where determination of fracture was based on review of radiographs without specific criteria for fracture identification (Namdari and Weiss, 2009; Neral et al., 2013). The higher fracture rate noted in our series may be partially attributable to a broader definition of radiographic fracture that captures more subtle fractures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…When collateral ligament reconstruction is possible, either to an allograft or to native bone, unconstrained prosthesis including the pyrocarbon arthroplasty or surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) is a viable option. 7,10,16,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25] This is an important consideration in younger patients given the high rate of fracture with silicone implants. 6,20 In our report, the patient initially had a satisfactory result after reconstruction with a fresh-frozen osteoarticular metacarpal head allograft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiographs from the time of our initial evaluation showed a lytic expansile lesion involving the distal half of the metacarpal, extending to the articular surface (May16, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When patients are not satisfied with nonoperative treatment, arthroplasty may be considered. 3 Silicone arthroplasties can be unstable and they can break leading to reactive synovitis in some cases. 4 Fixed fulcrum articulating implants have mixed results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%