2019
DOI: 10.1075/tis.18008.dem
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sign language interpreting services

Abstract: This article rethinks the impact of sign language interpreting services (SLIS) as a social institution. It starts from the observation that “access” for deaf people is tantamount to availability of sign language interpreters, and the often uncritically proposed and largely accepted solution at the institutional level to lack of access seems to be increasing the number of interpreters. Using documented examples from education and health care settings, we raise concerns that arise when SLIS become a prerequisite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, most deaf practitioners are located in London. Given the shift to remote working reported by UK respondents to this census, and from SLTI practitioners in other international locations since the pandemic (De Meulder et al, 2021), geographical location may be less of an issue if the “new normal” for post-pandemic SLTI provision involves a hybrid of face-to-face interactions and online work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, most deaf practitioners are located in London. Given the shift to remote working reported by UK respondents to this census, and from SLTI practitioners in other international locations since the pandemic (De Meulder et al, 2021), geographical location may be less of an issue if the “new normal” for post-pandemic SLTI provision involves a hybrid of face-to-face interactions and online work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCPs themselves should be prepared to provide the best care for their deaf-signing patients by understanding Deaf culture and considering the provision of direct language-concordant services. 37…”
Section: Sign Language Interpreter-mediated Health Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mediated communication, there is a perceived absence of intersubjectivity between deaf and hearing individuals, and the presence of interpreters as a symbol of the deaf person’s access can paradoxically work to reinforce, rather than dismantle inequalities (Young et al, 2019). For this reason, the preamble posted in Facebook may well serve as a reminder that sign language interpreters “do not solve communication problems in any absolute sense” (De Meulder & Haualand, 2019; Young et al, 2019, p. 106).…”
Section: Mediated Communication and Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%