Representation and diversity in the sign language translation and interpreting profession in the United Kingdom

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a nationwide sign language translator and interpreter (SLTI) census to establish a baseline description of the United Kingdom’s SLTI workforce that was commissioned by the Association of Sign Language Interpreters UK. Complete responses were received from 690 practitioners from across the United Kingdom (43% of the potential sample). The survey responses were analysed using the SPSS statistical software, specifically to look at various intersectional characteristics concerning gender, age, sexuality, race, and ethnicity. This article provides an overview of the findings with respect to two key themes: representation and diversity in the profession, along with discussion of the profile of the SLTI profession in the United Kingdom, and recommendations for actions for key stakeholder organisations. As a first snapshot, this census functions as a baseline for future comparisons, and can be modified and improved through open dialogue with professional and community groups. This snapshot helps us to identify gaps in representation. Finally, it can also inform the planning and forecasting of recruitment needs for the workforce and highlight any education and training needs.

Sign language ideologies and deaf interpreters in Canada

“…A total of 25 DI participants (46% of the target population) completed the survey. This is comparable with the results of Napier et al (2022), who reported a 43% response rate to their demographic survey of sign language interpreters in the United Kingdom. This is an acceptable response rate for sampling professional groups (Baruch & Holtom, 2008; cited in Napier et al, 2022), and it enables a snapshot of current DI demographics in Canada.…”

“…This is comparable with the results of Napier et al (2022), who reported a 43% response rate to their demographic survey of sign language interpreters in the United Kingdom. This is an acceptable response rate for sampling professional groups (Baruch & Holtom, 2008; cited in Napier et al, 2022), and it enables a snapshot of current DI demographics in Canada. Because the survey design and administration were intended to give all members of the DI population an equal opportunity to participate, even a relatively small sample size can yield results that accurately represent this population (Fogli & Herkenhoff, 2018).…”

“I feel a bit more of a conduit now”: Sign language interpreters coping and adapting during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond

“…The survey respondents were mostly female, reflecting the female-dominated sign language interpreting profession (Napier et al, 2022). Of the 331 respondents, 117 had 0–10 years of professional (paid) experience, 126 had 10–20 years of experience, and 88 had over 20 years of professional experience.…”

Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptance of the Deaf-in-Touch Everywhere (DITE™) Mobile App: Insights from Healthcare Simulations and Stakeholder Discussions (HEARD Project)

“…In the FGD, JBIMs highlighted a potential bene t of the DITE app for the Deaf community in that the app offers a unique feature allowing patients to select JBIMs based on preferences related to race, gender, and potentially religion. This ensures that Deaf patients can choose interpreters who resonate with their own backgrounds, fostering a sense of representation and inclusivity [35]. This dedicated effort to promote equality, diversity, and inclusion within the Deaf patient community is particularly crucial in Malaysia's diverse, multiracial, and multireligious context.…”