2004 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37530)
DOI: 10.1109/asmc.2004.1309570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sidewall roughness measurement: a comparison of in- and off-line AFM techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could confirm the agreement on the data between the current study and Dhariwal's experiments when the gap width is larger than 5 µm. On the other hand, the RMS roughness value on the aluminum sidewall in this study could be approximately 5 nm according to Guerry's measurements [19]. Therefore, this could be the rationale for higher electric breakdown voltages being measured on the aluminum electrodes in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This could confirm the agreement on the data between the current study and Dhariwal's experiments when the gap width is larger than 5 µm. On the other hand, the RMS roughness value on the aluminum sidewall in this study could be approximately 5 nm according to Guerry's measurements [19]. Therefore, this could be the rationale for higher electric breakdown voltages being measured on the aluminum electrodes in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Previously, sidewall surface roughness measurements have been reported using specialized tips for the AFM, novel systems incorporating an atomic force probe, or a dual-direction-sensing critical dimension (CD) mode AFM [5,[8][9][10]. However, implementation of those methods can be difficult [11,12] and automated CD mode AFM does not meet the required sub-ångström ( Å) range sensitivity due to tip shape effects and background noise levels [13]. Other works have reported the use of conventional AFM for collecting data on the sidewalls of tall lines in dense line test structures by cleaving and tilting the sample or toppling the lines to expose the sidewall on the top surface [14][15][16].…”
Section: Fin Sidewall Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slightly varying the procedure given in [13], three 200 nm scans were taken on each fin; four 50 nm areas from each scan were analysed. This produced a recommended sample size of 12.…”
Section: Sampling Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, other methods for measuring sidewall roughness are required. Several tools and methods were proposed in the literature [9,11]. However, all these methods are so far applied only to flat surfaces and not inside holes because of the influence of the hole curvature, or require special techniques or equipment which is not widely accessible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as semiconductor device features continue to shrink, sidewall imaging and microroughness measurements are becoming increasingly valuable tools for process development. On smaller features, sidewall roughness, if not controlled, can become a significant contribution to the overall feature size [8][9]. Higher aspect ratios have increased the difficulty of measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%