1985
DOI: 10.1063/1.95870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Si/SiO2 interface roughness: Structural observations and electrical consequences

Abstract: Electrical and structural characteristics of the nitrogen reaction at SiO2-Si interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 Since the natural oxide layer formed on Si surface is likely to have a close relation to microroughness, passivation methods of Si surface from natural oxidation have been widely investigated, 3,4 and H termination of Si surface by HF treatment has been clarified to be effective. However, it is pointed out that a few F species also exist on a Si wafer treated with HF solution and that a measurement of F behavior is necessary to know the mechanism of initial oxidation process.…”
Section: Measurement Of Adsorbed F Atoms On a Hf Treated Si Surface Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Since the natural oxide layer formed on Si surface is likely to have a close relation to microroughness, passivation methods of Si surface from natural oxidation have been widely investigated, 3,4 and H termination of Si surface by HF treatment has been clarified to be effective. However, it is pointed out that a few F species also exist on a Si wafer treated with HF solution and that a measurement of F behavior is necessary to know the mechanism of initial oxidation process.…”
Section: Measurement Of Adsorbed F Atoms On a Hf Treated Si Surface Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metallic contaminants picked up during the fabrication of an integrated circuit degrade the breakdown field of a SiO 2 film, 1-4 as do crystal lattice defects [4][5][6][7][8][9] and roughness of the wafer surface. 10 Although this degradation has been the subject of a large number of studies, it is still incompletely understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 Larger film roughness causes larger interfacial area, resulting in a possibility of more interface states even if their density per real interface area remains the same. 33 Furthermore, the increased roughness was most likely caused by different thermal expansion coefficients, and the residual strain in the film may also lead to increased band-gap states. 34 Our C-V and AFM results therefore suggest that sample A has both the lowest interface trap density and the smoothest Schottky anode interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%