1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.114068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of adsorbed F atoms on a HF treated Si surface using infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inAnalysis of native oxide growth process on an atomically flattened and hydrogen terminated Si (111) surface in pure water using Fourier transformed infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy Fourier transform infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy studies of adsorbates and surface reactions: Bridging the pressure gap between surface science and catalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 is 0.54, suggesting that the apparent reaction order with respect to HF is 1/2. Since infrared spectroscopic results indicate that fluorine atoms are found prefer-entially at steps, 55 these are the likely sites of attack by HF, consistent with AFM studies showing preferential deposition at defects. 42 Figure 5, which shows the reaction rate as a function of ionic strength, was constructed as a test to determine whether colloidal solution phase phenomena might play an important kinetic role.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…3 is 0.54, suggesting that the apparent reaction order with respect to HF is 1/2. Since infrared spectroscopic results indicate that fluorine atoms are found prefer-entially at steps, 55 these are the likely sites of attack by HF, consistent with AFM studies showing preferential deposition at defects. 42 Figure 5, which shows the reaction rate as a function of ionic strength, was constructed as a test to determine whether colloidal solution phase phenomena might play an important kinetic role.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Another explanation could be the H passivation of the surface, produced by the HF dip. But Yamada et al 13 showed that a water rinse hardly changed this H coverage, although it decreased the F concentration. Last, interdiffusion of Au and Si at the interface leading to an amorphous interlayer should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although the hexagonal polytypes 4H-SiC and 6H-SiC are structurally equivalent to the Si(111) surface, the HF wet-chemical treatments do not yield the desired monohydride coverage on SiC(0001) surfaces as already established by a number of studies on SiC 14 that report a considerable concentration of oxygen and fluorine on SiC, similar to that of diluted HF wet etching of Si surfaces. 15,16 In the case of the HCl/HF wetetched sample, residual F and O are strongly reduced, and the ϳ5-Å overlayer estimated by SE includes the effects of surface microroughness (RMS ϳ 3 Å as measured by AFM) and of carbon contamination (organic forms adsorbed from air and/or solution).…”
Section: Wet-etching Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%