2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10728-021-00441-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Digital Contact Tracing Technologies be used to Control COVID-19? Perspectives from an Australian Public Deliberation

Abstract: Mobile phone-based applications (apps) can promote faster targeted actions to control COVID-19. However, digital contact tracing systems raise concerns about data security, system effectiveness, and their potential to normalise privacy-invasive surveillance technologies. In the absence of mandates, public uptake depends on the acceptability and perceived legitimacy of using technologies that log interactions between individuals to build public health capacity. We report on six online deliberative workshops con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data security concerns, namely lack of privacy and fearing the normalisation of governmental tracking; functionality issues, in particular the negative effect on smartphone performance through increased battery usage; and privacy considerations due to the need for a centralised database, which is an integral design feature of tracing apps based on the centralised approach, were identified early as potential barriers for acceptance of the COVIDSafe app. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data security concerns, namely lack of privacy and fearing the normalisation of governmental tracking; functionality issues, in particular the negative effect on smartphone performance through increased battery usage; and privacy considerations due to the need for a centralised database, which is an integral design feature of tracing apps based on the centralised approach, were identified early as potential barriers for acceptance of the COVIDSafe app. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data security concerns, namely lack of privacy and fearing the normalization of governmental tracking; functionality issues, in particular negative impact on phone performance through increased battery usage; and privacy considerations due to the need for a centralized database, which is an integral design feature of tracing applications based on the centralized approach, were identified early as a potential barrier for acceptance of the COVIDSafe app. (19)(20)(21)(22)(23) Second, with a positive predictive value below 40% and an estimated sensitivity of 15%, the diagnostic performance of the app was not sufficiently high to add value for COVID-19 contact tracing in NSW. Given that the app is intended to complement rather than to replace conventional contact tracing, a modest sensitivity might have been acceptable, particularly since some exposure settings were judged to be high risk and broader close contact criteria were applied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Data security concerns, namely lack of privacy and fearing the normalization of governmental tracking; functionality issues, in particular negative impact on phone performance through increased battery usage; and privacy considerations due to the need for a centralized database, which is an integral design feature of tracing applications based on the centralized approach, were identified early as a potential barrier for acceptance of the COVIDSafe app. (19-23)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, data flow and storage have been restricted as a result of the Commonwealth Government's legislation. The COVID-19 Safe Bill 2020, introduced by the Australian government, forbids any entity to force anyone to use the app for any reason [ 116 ]. The GDPR, or General Data Protection Regulation, is one of the most well-known and widely recognized data protection laws in the world.…”
Section: Co-occurrence Analysis Of Abstract and Content Analysis Of T...mentioning
confidence: 99%