2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term Memory Maintenance of Object Locations during Active Navigation: Which Working Memory Subsystem Is Essential?

Abstract: The goal of the present study was to examine the extent to which working memory supports the maintenance of object locations during active spatial navigation. Participants were required to navigate a virtual environment and to encode the location of a target object. In the subsequent maintenance period they performed one of three secondary tasks that were designed to selectively load visual, verbal or spatial working memory subsystems. Thereafter participants re-entered the environment and navigated back to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study we examined the participants' ability to successfully solve a series of virtual Hebb-Williams maze configurations. The completion of the task requires appropriate use of visual cues (i.e., based on the unique configuration of walls and alleys in each maze) and working and reference memory abilities as the individual completes successive trials of each maze, which is dependent on visual processing and attention (i.e., selecting the most relevant information) while navigating through the maze (Baumann, Skilleter, & Mattingley, 2011;Klauer & Zhao, 2004;McConnell & Quinn, 2000;Ploran, Bevitt, Oshiro, Parasuraman, & Thompson, 2014). These processes parallel those involved in reading, which may explain why both animal models of reading disorder, and children with impaired reading ability exhibit reduced performance on this task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we examined the participants' ability to successfully solve a series of virtual Hebb-Williams maze configurations. The completion of the task requires appropriate use of visual cues (i.e., based on the unique configuration of walls and alleys in each maze) and working and reference memory abilities as the individual completes successive trials of each maze, which is dependent on visual processing and attention (i.e., selecting the most relevant information) while navigating through the maze (Baumann, Skilleter, & Mattingley, 2011;Klauer & Zhao, 2004;McConnell & Quinn, 2000;Ploran, Bevitt, Oshiro, Parasuraman, & Thompson, 2014). These processes parallel those involved in reading, which may explain why both animal models of reading disorder, and children with impaired reading ability exhibit reduced performance on this task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our mixed findings for the first two experiments show how important it is to consider a multifactorial approach. Other studies indicate that a distinction between low and high performers would have made sense (Baumann et al, 2011). Inter-individual spatial abilities, working memory capacities and different preferred strategies have to be taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we use a task repetition criterion to ensure learning and make forgetting more difficult (Corazzini et al, 2008 ). Eventually, when dealing with more complex search scenarios, taking into account that the user might forget a previously encountered location might be necessary (Baumann et al, 2011 ; Liverence and Scholl, 2015 ). Nevertheless, we account for apparent reductions in the user's knowledge of the BDT structure using the random model to penalize actions that, according to the model's encoding of the user's previous actions, represent mistakes in landmark choices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%