2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00125-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term changes in eating patterns explain the effects of condensed tannins on feed intake in heifers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
3
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
27
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result could be linked to a wider and more uniform distribution of eating activity throughout the whole day, which Bonanno et al (2007) observed on ewes grazing sulla compared with ewes grazing ryegrass and attributed to CT. Similarly, Landau et al (2000) demonstrated that CT-exposed cattle spent less time on main meals and had increased frequency of small meals; these authors interpreted this eating pattern as a means to preserve the ruminal environment from the negative effects of high CT intake, such as partial deactivation of microbial cellulase, and consequently lower fibre degradation in the rumen (Min et al, 2003) and impairment of DM and CP digestibility . On the contrary, in this study, the hypothesised eating pattern of S22 ewes (more small meals widely distributed throughout the day), attributed to CT, could have favoured a slower passage of ingesta along the digestive tract, or a more constant rumen environment, in this way improving nutrient utilisation, as can be presumed by the higher DM digestibility of S22 ewes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This result could be linked to a wider and more uniform distribution of eating activity throughout the whole day, which Bonanno et al (2007) observed on ewes grazing sulla compared with ewes grazing ryegrass and attributed to CT. Similarly, Landau et al (2000) demonstrated that CT-exposed cattle spent less time on main meals and had increased frequency of small meals; these authors interpreted this eating pattern as a means to preserve the ruminal environment from the negative effects of high CT intake, such as partial deactivation of microbial cellulase, and consequently lower fibre degradation in the rumen (Min et al, 2003) and impairment of DM and CP digestibility . On the contrary, in this study, the hypothesised eating pattern of S22 ewes (more small meals widely distributed throughout the day), attributed to CT, could have favoured a slower passage of ingesta along the digestive tract, or a more constant rumen environment, in this way improving nutrient utilisation, as can be presumed by the higher DM digestibility of S22 ewes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Abatement strategies themselves may affect feed intake (e.g. Landau et al, 2000), or affect CO 2 production without affecting intake (Bayaru et al, 2001).…”
Section: Portable Accumulation Chambers (Pac)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sumado a ello deben tenerse presente los mecanismos adaptativos especiales desarrollados por los animales. La presencia de Streptococcus caprinus en el rumen de caprinos y la secreción de saliva rica en prolina son las principales adaptaciones experimentadas por los caprinos, en los cuales plantas ricas en taninos son parte de su dieta (Landau 2000). Por otra parte, la toxicidad de los taninos para los animales no puede ser evaluada in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified