2009
DOI: 10.1071/bt09006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Communication. A robust method for chromosome quantification and ploidy determination in woody species

Abstract: Abstract. Accurate determination of ploidy level of putative polyploid plants is essential for tree breeding and other applications. Methods for ploidy determination include quantification of chromosome numbers in root-tip cells via light microscopy and indirect assessment via anatomical and morphological traits. Flow cytometry is potentially a highthroughput method to quantify nuclear DNA content; however, it does not allow determining chromosome numbers and interfering compounds often prevent its use. Micros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This introductory discussion statement of the first report on chromosome number variation in a set of Myrtaceae species Atchison (1947), provided an early indication of the limited variation in chromosome number in the family, later confirmed by several studies. Furthermore, Atchison (1947) also showed that chromosomes in Myrtaceae are generally small, ranging from 1.2 to 2.5 μm, making detailed cytogenetic analysis difficult, though improved methods have recently been successfully applied to Eucalyptus (Gamage and Schmidt 2009). In that original study by Atchison (1947), species of Psidium showed chromosome counts ranging from 2n022 to 88, strongly suggesting the occurrence of polyploidy.…”
Section: Cytogenetics and Genome Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This introductory discussion statement of the first report on chromosome number variation in a set of Myrtaceae species Atchison (1947), provided an early indication of the limited variation in chromosome number in the family, later confirmed by several studies. Furthermore, Atchison (1947) also showed that chromosomes in Myrtaceae are generally small, ranging from 1.2 to 2.5 μm, making detailed cytogenetic analysis difficult, though improved methods have recently been successfully applied to Eucalyptus (Gamage and Schmidt 2009). In that original study by Atchison (1947), species of Psidium showed chromosome counts ranging from 2n022 to 88, strongly suggesting the occurrence of polyploidy.…”
Section: Cytogenetics and Genome Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All wild trees and in vitro-cultured genotypes that originated from field shoots or zygotic embryos were diploid. Chromosome numbers were difficult to count due to their small size and high number, as discussed by Gamage and Schmidt (2009). However, the numbers recorded ( Figure 5C,D) supported the ploidy level indicated by flow cytometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Chromosomes could not be counted in cells of other tissue types, including regenerated roots. The procedure followed those of Andras et al (1999), and Gamage and Schmidt (2009) with modifications. Tissue was placed in a solution containing 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA) for 24 h at room temperature, followed by a 3:1 (v/v) ethanol:acetic acid fixative for ≥ 16 h. Hydrolysis was performed in 1.0 M hydrochloric acid (J.T.…”
Section: Chromosome Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromosomes 4, 8, and 10 varied in their classification, considering the three different ideograms. (Matsumoto et al 2000;Oudjehih and Abdellah 2006;Gamage and Schmidt 2009) and probably resulted in chromosomes with an over-condensed condition. Thus, cytogenetic analysis most of the eucalypt species studied was limited to chromosome counting.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the chromosome numbers of 135 Eucalyptus species have been described (Oudjehih and Abdellah 2006), in which, only seven have their karyotype assembled (Matsumoto et al 2000). Improvement in the cytogenetic protocols achieved to date for Eucalyptus (Gamage and Schmidt 2009), has not generated any information beyond chromosome counting. This indicates the limitation of a karyomorphological approach in cytogenetic studies for A few cytogenetic studies have been conducted on Eucalyptus citriodora.…”
Section: R a F T Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%