2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3649743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shocks to Hospital Occupancy and Mortality: Evidence from the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can only speculate that infectious diseases hospitals might have advantages in terms of newly equipped medical devices (lung ventilators, oxygen supplies), as well as better supply of medications which were suggested in the national protocol. On the other hand, the occupancy level of provisional hospitals was higher than infectious disease hospitals, especially during the peak period, which may have affected the quality of medical care and limited access to intensive care units in provisional hospitals [ 28 , 29 ]. Also, 77% of all PCR-test positive cases, 2% of all PCR-test negative cases and 8% of all PCR-test unknown cases were treated at infectious diseases hospitals, and probably they stayed at the hospital until clinical improvement or death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can only speculate that infectious diseases hospitals might have advantages in terms of newly equipped medical devices (lung ventilators, oxygen supplies), as well as better supply of medications which were suggested in the national protocol. On the other hand, the occupancy level of provisional hospitals was higher than infectious disease hospitals, especially during the peak period, which may have affected the quality of medical care and limited access to intensive care units in provisional hospitals [ 28 , 29 ]. Also, 77% of all PCR-test positive cases, 2% of all PCR-test negative cases and 8% of all PCR-test unknown cases were treated at infectious diseases hospitals, and probably they stayed at the hospital until clinical improvement or death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 These outcomes may include reductions in quality of care, such as increases in patient mortality, nosocomial infections, adverse events, and readmission. 6 This relationship has been studied in a variety of infectious diseases, including in H1N1, where 1% increases in acute respiratory infection admissions were associated with 0.25% increases in nonacute respiratory infection mortality, 4 and in COVID-19, where increased COVID-19 admissions are associated with unnecessarily high mortality rates. 27 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have demonstrated that nonzero levels of resource-intensive, highly contagious, and potentially fatal diseases have detrimental effects on the clinical outcomes of other hospital patients, even in cases where the critical disease or infection does not account for a majority of the hospital’s census. 4 , 5 , 6 In these cases, resource pooling may be similarly beneficial at reducing the strain on a single hospital by dispersing the resource and staffing demands among multiple institutions. 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the increase of urban population density, the expansion of urban scale and the change of human behavior, the incidence of various infectious diseases has shown a continuous upward trend. Many infectious diseases broke out in hospitals in the early stage, such as the worldwide H1N1 influenza pandemic [1], the outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in Korean hospitals [2] and so on. A new infectious disease is difficult to be identified in a short time even in the hospital, and it may cause a very high mortality rate in the early outbreak stage of the infectious disease [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%