2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(03)00110-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear characteristics of high-strength concrete deep beams without shear reinforcements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on non-linear fracture mechanics theory, Bažant and Kim 8 developed a size effect formula to consider the decrease in shear strength as the beam depth increases; this formula is adopted to modify the concrete properties used in the mechanism analysis presented in the current paper. Test results of simple deep beams performed by Tan and Lu 12 and Yang et al 13 showed that with the increase of section depth, the ultimate strength significantly decreased and the ACI 318-99 predictions became unconservative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on non-linear fracture mechanics theory, Bažant and Kim 8 developed a size effect formula to consider the decrease in shear strength as the beam depth increases; this formula is adopted to modify the concrete properties used in the mechanism analysis presented in the current paper. Test results of simple deep beams performed by Tan and Lu 12 and Yang et al 13 showed that with the increase of section depth, the ultimate strength significantly decreased and the ACI 318-99 predictions became unconservative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the appropriateness of the existing and proposed equations (and values) of the effective strengths of concrete struts, the ultimate strengths of 395 simply supported reinforced concrete deep beams, tested by Clark (1952), Smith and Vantsiotis (1982), Anderson and Ramirez (1989), Roller and Russell (1990), Tan et al (1995Tan et al ( , 1997aTan et al ( , 1997b, Teng et al (1996), Shin et al (1999), Oh and Shin (2001), Aguilar et al (2002), Yang et al (2003), Kim and Park (2005), Quintero-Febres et al (2006), Brena andRoy (2009), Sumpter et al (2009), and Lee et al (2011) were evaluated by using the three types of strut-tie models shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Strength Analyses Of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reserve shear strength, defined as the difference between the ultimate shear strength and the diagonal shear cracking strength of the deep beams (Yang et al 2003), of the NC-100 and SCC-100 specimens was 226 and 235 kN, respectively, while that of the NC-50 and SCC-50 specimens was 244 and 236 kN, respectively. As listed in Table 9, the value of the reserve shear strength factor, defined as the ratio of the ultimate shear strength to the diagonal shear cracking strength was defined as reserve shear strength factor used as a criterion to measure the reserve strength (Yang et al 2003), was 3.0 and 2.9 for the NC-100 and SCC-100 specimens, respectively, while 2.6 and 2.5 for the NC-50 and SCC-50 specimens was shown, respectively. It was found that the SCC specimens showed the similar reserved shear resisting strength in comparison with the NC specimens even with the two different web reinforcements.…”
Section: Load Carrying Capacities and Initial Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%