Abstract:An experimental study was carried out to evaluate fresh properties of a moderately high-strength (high-flowing) selfcompacting concrete (SCC) and to investigate shear behavior and performance of deep beams made with SCC. Fresh and hardened properties of normal concrete (NC) and SCC were evaluated. The workability and compacting ability were observed based on casting time and number of surface cavities, respectively. Four-point loading tests on four deep beams (two made with SCC and two with NC) were then condu… Show more
“…The failure mode of deep beams was usually shear failure rather than flexure failure. It has been widely shown that the shear capacity of RC deep beams increased as the strength of the concrete and web reinforcement ratio increased [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. FRC deep beams exhibit smaller crack widths and higher ultimate loads than those of RC deep beams [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ] researched the flexural behavior of RC and FRC deep beams.…”
Hybrid fiber reinforced concrete (HFRC) is based on a multilevel-reinforcement material design that improves both the compressive strength and tensile strength. Investigations of the mechanical performance of HFRC with two types of steel fibers were conducted experimentally. The investigated parameters were the volume fractions of the short steel fibers and long steel fibers. The compressive strength, tensile strength, and flexural strength of the HFRC were researched. The group with volume fractions of 1.5% for the long steel fibers and 0.5% for the short steel fibers exhibited the best flexural strength. The synergetic effect clearly was improved by combining different types of steel fiber. Four HFRC deep beams and one reinforced concrete (RC) deep beam were conducted to consider the shear behavior of these beams. The primary variables included the volume fraction of steel fibers and the web reinforcement ratio. The shear behavior was evaluated based on the cracking pattern, load-deflection behavior, and shear capacity. All of the beams failed due to the formation of diagonal cracks. The results indicated that hybrid fibers contribute greatly to the shear behavior of deep beams. The hybrid fibers led to the formation of multiple diagonal cracks in the deep beams and enhanced the damage tolerance. With the same web reinforcement ratio, the ultimate load and deformation of the HFRC deep beams were better than those of the RC deep beam.
“…The failure mode of deep beams was usually shear failure rather than flexure failure. It has been widely shown that the shear capacity of RC deep beams increased as the strength of the concrete and web reinforcement ratio increased [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. FRC deep beams exhibit smaller crack widths and higher ultimate loads than those of RC deep beams [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ] researched the flexural behavior of RC and FRC deep beams.…”
Hybrid fiber reinforced concrete (HFRC) is based on a multilevel-reinforcement material design that improves both the compressive strength and tensile strength. Investigations of the mechanical performance of HFRC with two types of steel fibers were conducted experimentally. The investigated parameters were the volume fractions of the short steel fibers and long steel fibers. The compressive strength, tensile strength, and flexural strength of the HFRC were researched. The group with volume fractions of 1.5% for the long steel fibers and 0.5% for the short steel fibers exhibited the best flexural strength. The synergetic effect clearly was improved by combining different types of steel fiber. Four HFRC deep beams and one reinforced concrete (RC) deep beam were conducted to consider the shear behavior of these beams. The primary variables included the volume fraction of steel fibers and the web reinforcement ratio. The shear behavior was evaluated based on the cracking pattern, load-deflection behavior, and shear capacity. All of the beams failed due to the formation of diagonal cracks. The results indicated that hybrid fibers contribute greatly to the shear behavior of deep beams. The hybrid fibers led to the formation of multiple diagonal cracks in the deep beams and enhanced the damage tolerance. With the same web reinforcement ratio, the ultimate load and deformation of the HFRC deep beams were better than those of the RC deep beam.
“…Experimental results showed that there was a 35 to 45% reduction in shear strength of simply supported SCC deep beams and higher mid-span deflection compared with their NC counterparts [6] owing to the lower amount and smaller size of coarse aggregate used in SCC mixtures. A number of studies on simply supported SCC deep beams [5,13] pointed out that the experimental shear capacity is much higher than that predicted by the shear provisions of the ACI 318-08. However, the prediction of the STM suggested by the ACI 318-08 was reasonably close to the experimental results of simply supported SCC deep beams [5] .…”
“…11(c)) (Mohammadhassani et al 2011). In Self compacting concrete (Choi et al 2012) and prestressed concrete deep beams (Tan et al 1999) failure mode is shear compression ( Fig. 11(e)).…”
Behaviour of RC beam panels is influenced by several factors. An alternative for conventional beam is 3D steel wire precast panel to behave as deep beam in various locations of RC building systems. Understanding the influence of factors involved on behaviour and strength is needed. The factors to be discussed include; compressive strength of concrete, percentage of tension reinforcement, quantity and distribution of vertical and horizontal web reinforcement, aggregate interlock, shear span-to-depth ratio, distribution of loading, side cover, and depth of beam. The influence of above parameters on the shear strength of reinforced concrete deep beams has been reviewed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.