2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.79.054607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp change-over from compound nuclear fission to quasifission

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The separation of quasifission from complete fusion-fission can be done in a variety of ways. The first method involves measuring the width of the fission mass distributions [24][25][26] . One assumes that fusion-fission gives symmetric mass distributions while quasifission gives rise to very asymmetric mass distributions.…”
Section: Fusion Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation of quasifission from complete fusion-fission can be done in a variety of ways. The first method involves measuring the width of the fission mass distributions [24][25][26] . One assumes that fusion-fission gives symmetric mass distributions while quasifission gives rise to very asymmetric mass distributions.…”
Section: Fusion Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured mean folding angle values are in good agreement with the calculated values (solid line in figure 2), at all studied energies. The results of folding angle distribution analysis suggest that the contribution, if any, of fission events originating from incomplete momentum transfer or incomplete fusion is negligible in the present reaction channel [45,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A larger assumed quasifission anisotropy for tip collisions (similar to or higher than the purple-yellow Subsequent measurements of fission characteristics at sub-barrier energies in similar reactions have generally shown anomalous sub-barrier behaviour, but these measurements with fissile actinide target nuclei are not as simple [183,184] as might be thought. Some measurements [185][186][187][188][189] at sub-barrier energies have found very large deviations in angular or mass distributions from expectations for fusion-fission, or from cross-bombardment measurements using other projectiles. These contrast with measurements where smaller, but still significant, effects are seen [41,117,184,[190][191][192][193][194][195], similar to those presented above [41] for 16 O+ 238 U.…”
Section: Evidence From Angular Anisotropiesmentioning
confidence: 98%