2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing carbon permits in industrial symbiosis: A game theory-based optimisation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the research assumptions, this paper draws on the study of non-cooperative and cooperative game theory method [ 58 , 59 ] to propose the assumptions. Yu et al assume that the blue carbon production cost of the ocean ranching enterprise as a quadratic function of the blue carbon output [ 56 ], which is the same as this research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the research assumptions, this paper draws on the study of non-cooperative and cooperative game theory method [ 58 , 59 ] to propose the assumptions. Yu et al assume that the blue carbon production cost of the ocean ranching enterprise as a quadratic function of the blue carbon output [ 56 ], which is the same as this research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cooperative game theory results show that each factory earns an average profit of 12% when sharing its carbon credits. Compared to working independently, plants are 25% more profitable when working in a coalition [ 51 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, in case when the FWEIP is formed by multiple individual entities, the outcome of the SSI can be used as a guide for further cooperative negotiations. For example, despite not covered in the scope of this work, the index can be used as a referenced indicator for fair distribution of profit sharing (e.g., greater share of profit is allocated for entity that play a more pivotal role) among multiple involved parties (e.g., shown in the work conducted by Fadzil et al, (2022)).…”
Section: Implication and Limitation Of The Fweip Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te supervision standard of the government civil afairs department is the national guidance on the operation of smart community. In comparison, it can play a positive role in correction, which is a kind of top-down communication [25]. At the same time, smart community should also make clear the dissatisfaction and desire of smart community residents to demand, provide more efcient institutional services, and seek their own development with a bottom-up feedback mechanism [26].…”
Section: Strategies For Institutional Behavior Improvement Formentioning
confidence: 99%