2011
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Hormone Levels and Risks of Estrogen Receptor-Negative and Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers

Abstract: Higher serum levels of bioavailable testosterone are associated with lower risks of ER-negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
66
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
66
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the majority of men with breast cancer have no identifiable risk factor, several have been identified with an imbalance in estrogen, excess or lack of androgen (chronic liver diseases, cryptorchidism and Klinefelter’s syndrome). Farhat et al [19], in a prospective study of healthy postmenopausal women who were not taking hormone therapy, observed that higher serum estradiol levels were associated with an increased risk of ER-positive breast cancer, although there is no information available in men. However, Callari et al [20] reported a different pattern of gene expression of steroid receptors in MBC specimens compared to samples of ER-positive FBC with similar clinical and pathological features, indicating that there may be many differences between the biology of MBC and FBC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the majority of men with breast cancer have no identifiable risk factor, several have been identified with an imbalance in estrogen, excess or lack of androgen (chronic liver diseases, cryptorchidism and Klinefelter’s syndrome). Farhat et al [19], in a prospective study of healthy postmenopausal women who were not taking hormone therapy, observed that higher serum estradiol levels were associated with an increased risk of ER-positive breast cancer, although there is no information available in men. However, Callari et al [20] reported a different pattern of gene expression of steroid receptors in MBC specimens compared to samples of ER-positive FBC with similar clinical and pathological features, indicating that there may be many differences between the biology of MBC and FBC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial studies that investigated ER-negative breast cancers included only 20-45 women with little power to show any significant association (12,15,17,27,28). More recently there have been two larger studies by James et al (13), who investigated 172 ER-negative breast cancers and by Fharat et al (14), who investigated 111 ER-negatives breast cancers, which have shown conflicting results. The first study reported serum androgens (testosterone and free testosterone) and estrogens (estradiol and free estradiol) to be associated with increased risks of both ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of such studies have explored overall breast cancer (8,10,11) or ER-positive breast cancer risk (9,12). There are only five studies that have reported the association by hormone receptor status (13)(14)(15)(16)(17). They are characterised by relatively small numbers and conflicting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial of Panagen in female patients with stage II-IV breast cancer displayed leukostimulatory and leukoprotective effects during chemotherapy [21]. The development and progression of breast cancer in human are under sex hormones control [8,10,22]. In thorax duct lymph of prolactin was decreased in animal after chemotherapy, whereas additional administration exogenous DNA possessed to save it on the levels as in control group of animals.…”
Section: International Journal Of Pharmacology Phytochemistry and Etmentioning
confidence: 99%